Jean has a post about belief at Talking Philosophy*. I find myself unconvinced, and I’m curious as to what other people think.
The idea is that ‘faith’ in the sense of belief without evidence is okay, and it’s belief in belief that is pernicious.
A person who was willing to believe nothing “on faith” would have a rather scanty store of beliefs. He or she would be missing some beliefs I take to be very important. For example—the belief that every human being matters. Exactly why does everyone matter? No doubt you could say a few intelligent things about it, but you’d soon find yourself not quite sure what the basis for the belief is.
I argued that moral … Read the rest