Some items loosely strung together
A new(ish) blog by a philosophy type: Delight Springs.
David Thompson points out that we’re allowed to dislike any religion. Yes, even that one.
Oliver Kamm also comments on Charlie Hebdo and free speech: “Those who claim that the state of their religious sensibilities is a justification for punishing speech have been rightly rebuffed.”
Stephen Law has an amusing post on pseudo-profundity (gee, what do you suppose put that idea in his head?).
If all your jargon is defined using other jargon, no one will ever be able to figure out exactly what you mean (though your devotees may think they know). And the fact that buried within your pseudo-profundities are one or true truisms will give your audience the impression that you must really be on to something, even if they don’t quite understand what it is.
That’s a key point, one I have not sufficiently taken into account – it is crucial to define all your jargon by means of other jargon. This way everyone enters the jargonic circle, from which escape is neither possible nor desirable.