Singh Case Highlights Libel Tourism Dangers *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

This may be the start of a grass-roots movement to reform the UK’s repressive libel laws.… Read the rest



Simon Singh and the Battle for Free Speech *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

The judge and the British Chiropractic association did not take account of the growth of science activism.… Read the rest



The Catholic Church’s Absolute Power in Ireland *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

Behind that pious cloud of incense, there lurked the terrorising of destitute, orphaned children.… Read the rest



Many Kinds of Abuse, Physical and Emotional *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

‘For years we wouldn’t believe that she had tried to get us out, but she made numerous attempts and was told it was impossible.’… Read the rest



Industrial School Victims Seek Justice *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

‘My mam died but they never told me she died. She died on Christmas Day but they never told me.’… Read the rest



The Irish Church Knew Abuse Was ‘Endemic’ *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

Church officials encouraged ritual beatings; inspectors failed to stop chronic beatings, rapes and humiliation.… Read the rest



Ireland: the Horror of Industrial Schools *

May 20th, 2009 | Filed by

Children lived in ‘daily terror’ of being beaten, the long-awaited Commission into Child Abuse report has found.… Read the rest



Sundays in the Times with Stan

May 19th, 2009 5:00 pm | By

Russell Blackford also says why Fish is wrong.

It is, of course, true that the grounding of any knowledge claim will eventually run out. If somebody does not accept our basic assumptions about what forms of argument are cogent and what counts as evidence, we can not convince her of anything that she does not want to be convinced of. For that reason, it’s true to say that there is no argument about anything that is effective in persuading all comers, no matter how fanatical or even insane…[W]hile our various chains of inference cannot be justified all the way down to all comers, it does not follow that none are better than others. Chains of inference don’t need to

Read the rest


The Fish files

May 19th, 2009 4:49 pm | By

Massimo Pigliucci says why Fish is wrong and silly.

[T]he problem lies with Fish’s cheap rhetorical trick: Stanley seems to think that once one has refuted the naive logical positivist view that human beings can adopt a purely objective viewpoint and grasp reality for what it actually is (a position that in philosophy has been abandoned since the 1950s, by the way), voilà, all knowledge has ultimately been shown to be a matter of faith…It is simply not true, as our friend cavalierly maintains, that “once the act of simply reporting or simply observing is exposed as a fiction — as something that just can’t be done — the facile opposition between faith-thinking and thinking grounded in independent evidence

Read the rest


Bible-verses on Defense Memos Inappropriate? *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Nah. Bush and Rummy ‘appreciated’ them, and that’s the important thing.… Read the rest



Bible-quoting Defense Memos *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Scary? Horrifying? You be the judge.… Read the rest



Orac on the Hauser Case *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

It will take time for CPS to find them. Meanwhile, his tumors are growing.… Read the rest



Warrant Issued for Mother of Daniel Hauser *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

The father testified that he doesn’t know the whereabouts of his son and his wife.… Read the rest



Daniel Hauser Fails to Appear at Court Hearing *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

District Judge John Rodenberg has issued an arrest warrant for Hauser’s mother; the two are missing.… Read the rest



Ed Brandon Reviews Galileo Goes to Jail *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

The important issues on the borders of science and religion are matters of what supports X rather than Y.… Read the rest



How the Light Gets In, Hay, May 22-31 *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Philosophy and music festival: Blackburn, Grayling, Malik, Neiman, Bauman, more.… Read the rest



Massimo Pigliucci on Fish on Epistemology *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Fish seems to think that once one has refuted the naive logical positivist view, all knowledge has been shown to be a matter of faith.… Read the rest



Russell Blackford on Fish on God *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

While chains of inference cannot be justified all the way down to all comers, it does not follow that none are better than others. … Read the rest



Piscis ipse dixit

May 18th, 2009 5:12 pm | By

Stanley Fish is back.

Evidence, understood as something that can be pointed to, is never an independent feature of the world. Rather, evidence comes into view (or doesn’t) in the light of assumptions…that produce the field of inquiry in the context of which (and only in the context of which) something can appear as evidence.

Yes yes yes, but it doesn’t follow that any and all assumptions are reasonable and sane and that therefore any old evidence is good evidence as long as it ‘comes into view in the light of’ some assumptions.

Then there is a swerve into a new topic, the fact that some people who commented on his previous musings on God claim that religion is … Read the rest



Martin in the Margins on Fish on God *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

The anti-rational evasions of Eagleton and Fish discredit the very cause they claim to defend.… Read the rest