Berlinerblau scolds the gnu atheists again *

Apr 12th, 2011 | Filed by

Louis, this looks like the start of a beautiful friendship.… Read the rest



Mona Eltahawy on the burqa *

Apr 12th, 2011 | Filed by

The burqa represents an ideology that does not believe in Muslim women’s rights to do anything but choose to cover her face.… Read the rest



Sex trafficking charity loses out to Salvation Army *

Apr 12th, 2011 | Filed by

Bad move.… Read the rest



Good old interfaith atheism

Apr 12th, 2011 11:41 am | By

Chris Stedman is (understandably) tired of my questions about his faithy status updates at Facebook, so I’d better stop asking them there. There is such a thing as being a pain in the ass, after all.

I’ll make a couple of remarks here, instead. If I’m going to be a pain in the ass I should be it here rather than on someone else’s updates.

The update in question was to say he’s joining the board of directors of something called World Faith. I found it, and it’s what you would expect from the name – it’s an interfaith thingy. It may be very benevolent and all, but it’s an interfaith thingy. It’s pro-faith. It valorizes faith. It … Read the rest



French burqa ban is in effect *

Apr 12th, 2011 | Filed by

Said a man, “According to this law, my wife would have to remain cloistered at home.”… Read the rest



Rigid, authoritarian, and emotionally abusive

Apr 11th, 2011 12:10 pm | By

Religion is not all bad, we’re told. Religion is often good, we’re told. Some atheists do nothing but bash religion, we’re told. Some atheists do nothing but bash “the religious,” we’re told.

Not all religions are literalist, we’re told. Not all religions are fundamentalist or theocratic or doctrinaire, we’re told. Unitarian Universalism, for instance, is liberal and swell, we’re told.

But some former Unitarian Universalists beg to differ.

There is a contrary trend, though, in many local UU congregations and in the national UU Association (“UUA”): extremely strong religious privilege and (largely as a consequence) severe distaste for open atheism and criticism of religion. Very few UUs believe in “God” as that term is broadly understood by theists

Read the rest


Bangladesh: girl whipped to death for being raped *

Apr 11th, 2011 | Filed by

She was 14. The man who raped her was her cousin, age 40. He’s alive and well.… Read the rest



Does Mo want to make $50,000? *

Apr 11th, 2011 | Filed by

He knows it’s not as easy as it looks.… Read the rest



Ben Goldacre on why cigarette packs matter *

Apr 11th, 2011 | Filed by

Cigarette packaging has been used to sell the crucial lie that cigarettes which are “light”, “mild”, “silver”, and the rest, are somehow “safer”.… Read the rest



When wives are set on fire for their dowry *

Apr 11th, 2011 | Filed by

At least 249 women were killed in 2010 for their dowry, according to the Bangladesh Society for the Enforcement of Human Rights.… Read the rest



“Holy man” committed sexual assault by proxy *

Apr 11th, 2011 | Filed by

Golossian convinced two Greek Orthodox women that they had been cursed by black magic and had to obey his angel-given instructions.… Read the rest



The Postmodern Interpretation of Witchcraft

Apr 10th, 2011 | By Joshua Leach

Today, the great wave of postmodernist and poststructuralist academic writing, with its epistemological relativism and obfuscating rhetoric, has largely subsided.  It may never disappear, as few things do, and it may have become so thoroughly embedded in certain disciplines as to color them for the foreseeable future.  However, the vogue for “discourses” and “hermeneutics” has largely passed its prime, and disciplines which once felt themselves to be engaged in a life-or-death struggle with the new wave of academics (anthropology, history, e.g.) now seem to be regaining their footing and reclaiming a scientific basis. 

History cannot be written if we do not believe that any one narrative of the past is more “true” than another, or that it is possible, despite … Read the rest



The notion Lord Rees so casually endorses

Apr 10th, 2011 11:21 am | By

Nick Cohen is not unduly impressed by the Templeton Foundation.

Initially, it made no secret of its admiration for clerical hucksters and dispensed prizes to the evangelical showman Billy Graham and Mother Teresa, who sought to wallow in Calcuttan poverty rather than end it. Now it has moved upmarket and seeks to reward intellectuals who allow religion to scrape an acquaintance with science; who imply, however vaguely, that evidence-based research and ancient fable are compatible.

That’s the one. I point this out because the gnu-haters have been so energetically defending it in the past few days – I want to underline the fact that Nick is not an ally in that project.

Rees is not, Nick points out, actually religious.… Read the rest



Eric MacDonald on the betrayal of reason *

Apr 10th, 2011 | Filed by

Templeton is endeavouring to return human thought to the deeply conflicted state that Newton and Spinoza had to live with.… Read the rest



John Horgan in SciAm on the Templeton prize *

Apr 10th, 2011 | Filed by

The Templeton Foundation promotes a view of science and religion as roughly equivalent.… Read the rest



Nick Cohen on Templeton and “respect” for religion *

Apr 10th, 2011 | Filed by

In the past, the faithful did not accuse their critics of mere bad manners.… Read the rest



Ruse rhymes with loose, he says so himself

Apr 9th, 2011 3:42 pm | By

Just a little note to point out the consistent rudeness and inaccuracy (to put it politely) of Michael Ruse.

I read one of the responses to my recent piece on Darwinism and the problem of evil. One of the junior new atheists — that is to say, not one of the big four of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris — took extreme umbrage to my picking on him (even more umbrage at my not naming him by name) and my suggesting that absolute reality might not correspond exactly to his worldview.

No he didn’t. Any “umbrage” he took was a good deal less extreme than the umbrage Ruse routinely takes at (not to: at) a … Read the rest



Michael Ruse on…the new atheists *

Apr 9th, 2011 | Filed by

Yes really. Again.… Read the rest



Barbara Forrest on a prayer network malfunction? *

Apr 9th, 2011 | Filed by

The Louisiana Coalition for Science says the Louisiana Science Education Act is a creationist law; now a prayer group has slipped up and confirmed that.… Read the rest



The Tennessee legislature helps out

Apr 9th, 2011 11:35 am | By

Brilliant.

In a 70-28 vote today, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed HB 368, a bill that encourages science teachers to explore controversial topics without fear of reprisal. Critics say the measure will enable K-12 teachers to present intelligent design and creationism as acceptable alternatives to evolution in the classroom.

“There has been a widespread pattern of discrimination against educators who would challenge evolution in the classroom,” Casey Luskin, a policy analyst for the pro-intelligent design Discovery Institute, in Seattle, Washington, told ScienceInsider. “Schools censor from students the evidence against evolution. This protects the rights of teachers to teach in an objective way.” The Discovery Institute supports the bill and others like it in other states.

And … Read the rest