The Vatican’s banking arm
An Irish bank loaned huge sums to Catholic dioceses in the US with the result that the dioceses in question were able to stay out of court.
Of the deals, by far the largest line of credit was for Los Angeles, for $256m. The diocese avoided going into court with abuse victims by reaching a settlement in advance.
It emerged afterwards that AIB loans and guarantees accounted for almost half of total settlement.
The deal included $175m in cash and another $25m to pay the interest, and helped Los Angeles avoid selling the bulk of its properties or reveal the true value of its total assets.
Which was very kind of the bank…which is odd, given that banks aren’t usually in the kindness business.
An AIB spokesman said: ‘AIB’s business focus in America was in the ‘Not for Profit’ areas and this included churches.
‘Any loans advanced were approved in accordance with AIBGroup policy.’
An AIB source said they were ‘standard commercial loans’.
Not for profit, but commercial? What does that mean?
Only after the revelations in the Boston diocese in 2002 did [one victim] set off on the long road to forcing the Archdiocese of Los Angeles to reveal what it knew. Esther’s case was one of hundreds, which were finally settled in mid 2007 for $660m.
…
And she had no idea until this week that Allied Irish Bank had helpfully stepped in with guarantees of hundreds of millions.
The deal allowed the Archdiocese to avoid going to court and opening all its documents to scrutiny.
What a very kind bank.
Oh, here in Vaticalia the Vaticanos are all blah blah blah about cracking down on tax evasion. And they don’t pay taxes on their massively lucrative commercial exercises. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. But it’s what they do over at teh RCC – they chastise others for doing exactly what they do. Then cry, NOT FOR PROFIT! Hand off! We’re a religion!
Has Standard & Poors downgraded Jesus (Dow ID=GOD) to AA yet?
Wait- the bank loaned them money and then loaned them more money to pay the interest on the first money back to the bank that loaned the money in the first place (and the interest-payment money in the second place)?
THAT sounds like ‘standard commercial loans’ that are ‘in accordance with AIBGroup policy.’
Now tell me why that isn’t ‘policy’ for mortgages?
The followers of Jesus: paying hush money for 2000 years and no end in sight.
When it comes to current scandals, it would appear that, over time, the probability that they will resemble the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the GFC approaches 1.
Well, that’s gonna pay for a metric fuckton of indulgences for the AIB Board!!