Managing him
Another piece on how Trump’s people have to manage him as if he were a volatile heavily-armed toddler.
As Trump is beginning to better understand the challenges—and the limits—of the presidency, his aides are understanding better how to manage perhaps the most improvisational and free-wheeling president in history. “If you’re an adviser to him, your job is to help him at the margins,” said one Trump confidante. “To talk him out of doing crazy things.”
Interviews with White House officials, friends of Trump, veterans of his campaign and lawmakers paint a picture of a White House that has been slow to adapt to the demands of the most powerful office on earth.
“Everyone is concerned that things are not running that well,” said one senior official. “There should be more structure in place so we know who is working on what and who is responsible for what, instead of everyone freelancing on everything.”
But they’re learning. One key development: White House aides have figured out that it’s best not to present Trump with too many competing options when it comes to matters of policy or strategy. Instead, the way to win Trump over, they say, is to present him a single preferred course of action and then walk him through what the outcome could be – and especially how it will play in the press.
As if he were a literal child. They have to “manage” him as if he were a literal child but one with dangerous powers. They can’t treat him like a fellow adult, because he isn’t.
“You don’t walk in with a traditional presentation, like a binder or a PowerPoint. He doesn’t care. He doesn’t consume information that way,” said one senior administration official. “You go in and tell him the pros and cons, and what the media coverage is going to be like.”
He doesn’t consume information that way – meaning, he’s stupid, and barely literate, and lazy, and not in the habit of thinking.
Downplaying the downside risk of a decision can win out in the short term. But the risk is a presidential dressing-down—delivered in a yell. “You don’t want to be the person who sold him on something that turned out to be a bad idea,” the person said.
Advisers have tried to curtail Trump’s idle hours, hoping to prevent him from watching cable news or calling old friends and then tweeting about it. That only works during the workday, though—Trump’s evenings and weekends have remained largely his own.
“It’s not like the White House doesn’t have a plan to fill his time productively but at the end of the day he’s in charge of his schedule,” said one person close to the White House. “He does not like being managed.”
Of course he doesn’t, but he’s so dangerous he has to be managed. But he refuses to be managed, and some damn fool left the door open and let him be elected president.
While his predecessor was known as “no-drama Obama,” Trump has presided over a series of melodramas involving his top aides, including Priebus, Bannon, counselor Kellyanne Conway and economic adviser Gary Cohn.
“He has always been a guy who loves the idea of being a royal surrounded by a court,” said Michael D’Antonio, one of Trump’s biographers.
Not the idea of doing the real work of presiding over a major government, but the idea of playing king surrounded by lackeys.
Trump continues to crave attention and approval from news media figures. Trump huddled in the Oval Office with Matt Drudge, the reclusive operator of the influential Drudge Report, to talk about his administration and the site. Drudge and Kushner have also begun to communicate frequently, said people familiar with the conversations. Drudge, whose visits to the White House haven’t previously been reported, didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Several senior administration aides said Trump loves nothing more than talking to reporters – no matter what he says about the “failing” New York Times or CNN – and he often seems personally stung by negative coverage, cursing and yelling at the TV.
Good. I hope it stings sharply. It’s the only consolation we’ll ever get.
Trump was grinning in his office last week. He wanted to pose for pictures behind the cleaned-off Resolute desk and in front of his gold curtains. He has posed for hundreds of pictures there – sometimes with a grin, sometimes with a thumbs-up – and has guests stand behind him.
Of course he has. That’s what he is – a shallow, greedy, self-important child.
Two good pieces on Trump from the (Australian) ABC.
1. Is Trump the most unpopular US President in history?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-28/donald-trump-is-he-the-most-unpopular-president-in-history/8469854
2. Worse than Watergate: John Dean predicts Trump’s downfall.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-24/worse-than-watergate%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%A6-john-dean-predicts-trump%E2%80%99s/8385196
This is all a natural outgrowth of the long-standing Republican Party delusion that ‘government should be run like a business”. They consistently push CEOs as their candidates, but they don’t comprehend that, even if you set aside the issue of a ‘business’ whose customers, employees and stockholders are ostensibly all the same people, the model they propose gets the Constitution backwards, at best. The usual model is President as CEO, Congress as the board of directors and SCOTUS is, at most, the legal department. The board’s role is to act as a cheerleader for the CEO, giving him all the authority he needs to direct the company’s operations, and only intervening in dire circumstance. The SCOTUS is there to put forward some advice, but otherwise to mainly deal with any interference arising from the CEO’s policies.
But of course, that’s never how it was set up. The President is a major stockholder (until President Orange Tempertantrum, the majority stockholder)–he’s got the vocal support of the most organized stockholders–but that doesn’t mean his demands are going to make sense for the company. Congress would be the CEO–the ones who actually decide and implement policy. SCOTUS gets the job of the board of directors, intervening with potentially disastrous policies, but otherwise just letting things roll along.
Another key development: White House aides have figured out how to become the ones running the country.
One option??? As in “Let’s present him with THIS?” As in “Let’s tell him it’s great publicity?” JFC.
Billy Mumy in that Twilight Zone episode.
And I’ll bet the “pros and cons” must all be presented in terms of how things are going to make him look.
I hate the use of euphemisms like “the most improvisational and free-wheeling president in history.” Improvisation suggests jazz musicians or sketch-comedy groups, things that require skill, talent and cooperation and collaboration with fellow performers. Better words would be: chaotic, disorganized, undisciplined, unprepared, incompetent…. We’ve used many of them here. The press has to stop polishing and sugar coating this turd.
Not Bruce, maybe free-wheeling refers to his truck driving photo-op?
Other non-euphemisms I could add are corrupt, greedy, sleazy, nepotism…the list goes on.
Heh. One rule of thumb I learned about presenting to management to get buy in, is to present three courses of action, two of which have clear downsides, so the “decision-maker” can “decide” to go with the course of action you are really recommending.
Sounds like that approach is just too much for Trump. Just tell him the one thing to do. Use small words.
And never forget to bring the clue-by-four. Apply directy to the forehead, wasn’t it?