Up for grabs
The Washington Post has more on the Congressional land giveaway move.
House Republicans on Tuesday changed the way Congress calculates the cost of transferring federal lands to the states and other entities, a move that will make it easier for members of the new Congress to cede federal control of public lands.
…
Many Republicans, including House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-Utah), have been pushing to hand over large areas of federal land to state and local authorities, on the grounds that they will be more responsive to the concerns of local residents.
Great – so if local residents want casinos in Yosemite or high rises in Yellowstone, they should be able to have them? Or is it possible that in fact places like Yosemite and Yellowstone should be preserved for everyone – not even just all Americans but all people?
[M]any Democrats argue that these lands should be managed on behalf of all Americans, not just those living nearby, and warn that cash-strapped state and local officials might sell these parcels to developers.
Like the one soon to be degrading the White House.
Rep. Raul Grijalva (Ariz.), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee, sent a letter Tuesday to fellow Democrats urging them to oppose the rules package on the basis of that proposal.
“The House Republican plan to give away America’s public lands for free is outrageous and absurd,” Grijalva said in a statement. “This proposed rule change would make it easier to implement this plan by allowing the Congress to give away every single piece of property we own, for free, and pretend we have lost nothing of any value. Not only is this fiscally irresponsible, but it is also a flagrant attack on places and resources valued and beloved by the American people.”
Environmental groups were quick to criticize the move.
Alan Rowsome, senior government relations director for The Wilderness Society, said in a statement, “Right out of the gate, Congressional Republicans are declaring open season on federal lands… This is not Theodore Roosevelt-style governing, this move paves the way for a wholesale giveaway of our American hunting, fishing and camping lands that belong to us all.”
Next up: the move to privatize air.
Well, it’s not like breathing is a right or anything.
I think I may have my next play idea. Shall I put you two in the acknowledgements, and invite you to the first Broadway showing on comp tickets?
Broadway? Sure, thanks!
I’m glad it’s an idea for a play and not a startup for breath meters, air tickets or oxygen coupons.
@2 Ben Elton beat you to it 30 years ago. Saw it on the West End, appropriately called Gasp!
Sure, Spacejunkie, but realistically, aren’t most plots reworkings of old plots? I would “imbue my own unique style” into the work, as one of my playwriting friends said recently when trying to persuade me not to drop work on a piece that apparently is close to identical to a TV show I never saw and didn’t know existed. He failed. But…I guess what I am saying, there is usually something new you can bring to a story. I rewrite other people’s stories from time to time, though usually to take on a misogynistic theme and ridicule it.