2/ The article still has two stealth edits that it shouldn't have: The editors never acknowledged a change to the very first sentence, which initially misrepresented the ruling badly, and more recently a deletion of a reference to PBs being 'reversible,' full-stop. But whatever. — Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) February 2, 2021
2/ The article still has two stealth edits that it shouldn't have: The editors never acknowledged a change to the very first sentence, which initially misrepresented the ruling badly, and more recently a deletion of a reference to PBs being 'reversible,' full-stop. But whatever.
— Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) February 2, 2021
4/ Too petty not to recirculate this once more. This was the reaction of a top-level editor at a top-tier publication to criticism of a piece that turned out, as his own publication would later acknowledge, to be correct.https://t.co/qVvSNUawbK — Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) February 2, 2021
4/ Too petty not to recirculate this once more. This was the reaction of a top-level editor at a top-tier publication to criticism of a piece that turned out, as his own publication would later acknowledge, to be correct.https://t.co/qVvSNUawbK
Huh, wonder if Palmer is going to denounce his boss as a transphobe for agreeing to make the corrections that Palmer dismissed as transphobic?
“OK, but apart from all those glaring errors”
Huh, wonder if Palmer is going to denounce his boss as a transphobe for agreeing to make the corrections that Palmer dismissed as transphobic?
“OK, but apart from all those glaring errors”