All entries by this author

One Law for All holds “Enemies not Allies” seminar *

Feb 10th, 2011 | Filed by

Far-right groups and Islamist groups deserve each other.… Read the rest



Mubarak may step down *

Feb 10th, 2011 | Filed by

Hassan al-Roweni, an Egyptian army commander, told protesters in the square that “everything you want will be realised”.… Read the rest



Distortions

Feb 9th, 2011 4:18 pm | By

Does Mary Midgley give Richard Dawkins a percentage? She certainly should. She’s making a full-time career of telling him to stop doing things he doesn’t do.

Midgley’s new book continues her many years of taking neo-Darwinists to task because, she says, they distort the legacy of the great English naturalist who inspired them.

Yes, many years. Many, many years. More than thirty of the bastards. She was told she had it all wrong the same number of years ago, but her new book continues the same old bullshit she was told was all wrong all those years ago. I’d say she owes Richard a cut.

And what’s this crap about “distorting” Darwin’s “legacy,” anyway? Does she think Darwin wrote … Read the rest



Never mind Scientology, what about Catholicism?

Feb 9th, 2011 | Filed by

Is one any less ridiculous than the other?… Read the rest



So how about that Scientology piece? *

Feb 9th, 2011 | Filed by

Is it the beginning of the end or just same old same old?… Read the rest



Lawrence Wright on Scientology *

Feb 9th, 2011 | Filed by
Recruits had a sense of boundless possibility. Mystical powers were forecast; out-of-body experiences were to be expected; fundamental secrets were to be revealed… Read the rest


Salvation? There’s an app for that *

Feb 8th, 2011 | Filed by

It lets you pick a commandment and tick off all your sins, keeping a running tally to bring into the confessional with you.… Read the rest



Harris and Pigliucci: On moral philosophy

Feb 8th, 2011 | By Peter Beattie

Say what you will, Sam Harris knows how to stir a hive and send its inhabitants into a positive buzz. Some of them will turn this into an opportunity to get some intellectual exercise. Others may fly into a frenzy and sting at anything and everything, eventually disembowelling themselves intellectually in the process. Of the first, Brother Blackford (to co-opt a recently Coyned soubriquet) is a prime example: his ruminations are clearly valuable to the discussion. But where clarity is its own reward, the contributions of others need to be carefully disentangled from their ill-conceived targets, in order that everybody may see clearly where they went off course. Massimo Pigliucci has thankfully supplied us with such an opportunity—one is tempted … Read the rest



I don’t see how the argument even begins

Feb 8th, 2011 12:36 pm | By

I’ve read an advance copy of Reasonable Atheism by Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse. It’s a good book. I have some disagreements though, and some things I don’t understand, or suspect I don’t understand, or both; I’ve been waiting to post about them, until closer to the pub date, but now that they’re posting about it, I figure it’s close enough.

One (highly reasonable) point they make is that atheists should argue well instead of badly. One example of arguing well, they say, is taking the Ontological Argument seriously.

We take the Ontological Argument as the litmus test for intellectual seriousness, both for atheists and religious believers alike. Anyone who takes the question of God’s existence seriously must grapple

Read the rest


Jesus gives birth control advice *

Feb 8th, 2011 | Filed by

Why bother when God can just impregnate at will?… Read the rest



Can we have a godless US president? Ever? *

Feb 8th, 2011 | Filed by

Obama seems to claim a direct channel to the Almighty and to see himself as God’s representative on earth.… Read the rest



Dan Fincke on the A word *

Feb 8th, 2011 | Filed by

It is in the theist’s interest to convince people that atheism necessarily involves much more certitude than it does.… Read the rest



Aikin and Talisse on accommodationism and atheism *

Feb 7th, 2011 | Filed by

Religious believers have an inflated sense of the strength of the evidence in support of their view.… Read the rest



Novelty

Feb 7th, 2011 12:19 pm | By

Eric is arguing that we should accept the label “new atheism” and run with it. He sets out three items that define a new atheist:

(i) a belief in the harmfulness of religion, both in a political and an intellectual sense; (ii) a conviction that there is no evidence for belief in a god; (iii) a general agreement that (i) and (ii) mean that we must actively oppose religion.

I would insert a new (iii): a conviction or a sense that the widespread (at least in the US) expectation that one should believe in god as if (ii) were of no relevance whatsoever, is an offensive imposition.

That’s what is New in my New Atheism, at any rate. I’ve been … Read the rest



Al Mohler explains about new atheism *

Feb 7th, 2011 | Filed by

The New Atheists intend to use the Dogma of Darwinism to malign belief in God and to marginalize Christians and Christian arguments. Srsly.… Read the rest



What David Kato’s murder can teach the world *

Feb 7th, 2011 | Filed by

Like racism and misogyny, homophobia is prejudice born of ignorance.… Read the rest



When will the AAAS stop pandering to superstition *

Feb 7th, 2011 | Filed by

The AAAS is pandering to evangelical Christianity, and minority views in opposition to science are being presented as reasonable compromises.… Read the rest



Toronto: Fatah-Shaikh debate called off *

Feb 7th, 2011 | Filed by

Shaikh challenged Fatah to a debate, calling on “the controversial author to publicly defend his moderate views.” sic!… Read the rest



Sex, secrecy and religion in Africa

Feb 6th, 2011 | By Leo Igwe

“Secrecy,” says American fiction writer, Robert Heinlein, “is the beginning of tyranny”. But I think, secrecy is actually the abode of darkness, ignorance, prejudice and confusion. Because whatever is held in secret is like something held in the dark- it can be anything, it can become anything. It can become nothing.

In Africa, so much secrecy prevails in the area of human sexuality. Sexual expressions are preferably done in secret or discussed in hushed tones. There is hardly any open honest debate or dialogue on sexual issues going on anywhere on the continent. All questions about sexual matters appear to have been answered and such answers are taken to be correct- absolutely correct. Sexual rules are taken to be beaten … Read the rest



Indian court rules astrology is a science *

Feb 6th, 2011 | Filed by

For reals.… Read the rest