All entries by this author

On Mark Lilla and Charles Taylor on Secularism *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

We have not vanquished political theology -only sedated the beast, hoping it does not again awake. … Read the rest



Risky Scholarship *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

Haleh Esfandiari’s time in Evin prison highlights the danger of studying repressive regimes.… Read the rest



Why Minorities Should Cherish Free Speech *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

‘If people were forced by law to respect other people’s identities, you couldn’t criticise anything.’… Read the rest



Ali Eteraz on an Islamic Counter-reformation *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

The one thing the traditionalists guarded more than anything was the power to hand down fatwas.… Read the rest



Two Plays About Muslim Women *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

And the men who murder them.… Read the rest



Nuns and Child Abuse *

Oct 3rd, 2007 | Filed by

No audit has been carried out to determine how many nuns have abused children. … Read the rest



The New Humanist Manifesto

Oct 3rd, 2007 | By R. Joseph Hoffmann

The New Humanist Manifesto

1. There are lots and lots of atheists and agnostics and people who really don’t know really what to think, or why.

2. We need to build a movement just for them.

3. And a big table.

4. Atheists and agnostics really need to discover the wisdom of the Buddha…

5. And Rainbow Love.

6. The problem with the Old Humanism is that it is Old.

7. The New Humanism is New. This is fundamental.

8. In the new humanism, everything will be tentative. For example, if someone asks us, “What do you stand for?” we must not take offense. We must say: “Why is that important to you?”

9. Similarly, if an Anti-New Humanist attacks … Read the rest



Why you must be secular

Oct 2nd, 2007 5:56 pm | By

Mitchell Cohen in Dissent.

The left everywhere ought to be identified with both tolerance (this has not always been so) and with critical intelligence – the latter often means challenging religious precepts, ambitions and institutionalized power. The hard thing is to balance the tolerance and the criticism, to insist on pluralism but not to allow religion to privilege itself in the public realm. The left should always want people to think for themselves, but this cannot mean “you must be secular like me” since it also should not mean “you must be religious like me.”

That last sentence isn’t right. ‘Secular’ doesn’t mean not religious, it means not theocratic. Wanting people to think for themselves pretty much does mean … Read the rest



Review of Nussbaum’s The Clash Within *

Oct 2nd, 2007 | Filed by

What the Hindu fundamentalist forces did to the foundations of Indian civilisation has now become well known. … Read the rest



God’s Sick Punch Lines *

Oct 2nd, 2007 | Filed by

Around the world, more and more people seem to be finding Gods, each more hateful and bloody than the next.… Read the rest



Logical Path from Religious Beliefs to Evil Deeds *

Oct 2nd, 2007 | Filed by

Religion can change the definition of good.… Read the rest



Karen Armstrong Blames Dawkins for Islamism *

Oct 2nd, 2007 | Filed by

But Koranic fundamentalists are capable of coming up with their own follies without outside prompting.… Read the rest



Mitchell Cohen on the ‘New’ Atheism *

Oct 2nd, 2007 | Filed by

Parts of the left apologize for Islamism as an earlier generation found ways to apologize for Stalinism. … Read the rest



Legacy of the Little Rock Nine *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

Eisenhower sent paratroopers to enforce the Supreme Court decision against popular resistance.… Read the rest



Nigel Warburton on Doctors’ Consciences *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

Idea that doctors could refuse treatments because of their cultural preferences is very worrying.… Read the rest



Stephen Law on Happiness *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

Is happiness just about feeling good, or is there more to it? Is feeling good always what motivates us?… Read the rest



Dawkins on Atheism in America *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

‘I would like to see people encouraged to rejoice in the world in which they find themselves.’… Read the rest



Theo Hobson Pitches Another Fit *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

Atheists are militant and arrogant and everybody hates’em, they are they are they are.… Read the rest



Ian Buruma Points out the Obvious *

Oct 1st, 2007 | Filed by

Religion is sometimes a force for good; other times it’s not; communism can work the same way; etc.… Read the rest



A bit too non-linear

Oct 1st, 2007 11:54 am | By

Did Ian Buruma write this in ten minutes, or what? It’s all over the place.

It has become fashionable in certain smart circles to regard atheism as a sign of superior education, of highly evolved civilization, of enlightenment. Recent bestsellers by Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and others suggest that religious faith is a sign of backwardness…

Oh get over it for Christ’s sake. Is there no end to the market for people complaining about this overwhelming flood of atheist books that add up to all of five which is as a grain of sand to a beach compared to the flood of theist bestsellers? There certainly doesn’t seem to be. Is this the top item in The Lazy Editor’s HandbookRead the rest