I don’t agree
No.
Not forcing “someone”: forcing a woman.
Not “their” will: her will.
Not “Americans”: American women.
NOT PREGNANT PERSON. JUST STOP.
Tip Jar
No.
Not forcing “someone”: forcing a woman.
Not “their” will: her will.
Not “Americans”: American women.
NOT PREGNANT PERSON. JUST STOP.
AI is in favor of legalizing prostitution which then leads to increased human trafficking.
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/08/amnesty-international-betrays-women
AI is no friend to women at all.
Didn’t they hire some guy who is a convicted trafficker?
As I’ve said, continuing this game of pretend while aware of polling data showing the persuasive efficacy of woman- and girl-specific language demonstrates that these organizations are emphatically not committed to their stated goals. They are playing to win. It’s just that the game isn’t the one advertised.
Ok, it’s probably just me, but when I hear the term “pregnant people” I think of assigning a role to one of those FischerPrice people of uncertain sex in order to play. “Okay, the red one will be the one selling cribs and the green one is the pregnant person. Okay? The shoe is a car.”
It just seems so artificial on so many levels.
I don’t know how other men feel, but I think it would be a bit past tyranny if someone made me carry a pregnancy to term against my will. I’m not even TQ+!