John Gray Calls Himself a Heretic *

Dec 4th, 2005 | Filed by

‘His fiercest scorn has switched to the disciples of rationalism and of science.’… Read the rest



Knowing our own Minds *

Dec 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Do we have privileged access but not peculiar, or peculiar but not privileged?… Read the rest



References not to Gramsci but to Sayyid Qutb *

Dec 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Self-appointed rebel heroes like to adorn themselves with flattering titles.… Read the rest



Naturalism v Supernaturalism *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Worldview based on empirical inquiry, not faith or authority, is the clear choice against totalitarianism… Read the rest



Chet Raymo on Meera Nanda *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

What looks like tolerant ‘permission to be different’ is actually condescension.… Read the rest



Instead of Celebrating Einstein Year *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Physicists worry about dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school.… Read the rest



New Homeopathy ‘Study’ a Tiny Bit Flawed *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

No control group, glaring exclusions and bias, little things like that.… Read the rest



Richard Dawkins on the Illusion of Design *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

The unaided laws of physics could come to mimic deliberate design.… Read the rest



Nothing Like Squalor to Trigger Nostalgia *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Fleet Street hacks get bad rap; Scoop, Boot, Beast, set tone.… Read the rest



Tories Pick Posh Leader Thanks to Hugh Grant *

Dec 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

‘Notting Hill’ made it cool to be posh therefore Eton is okay. Eh?… Read the rest



A Valediction Forbidding Nonsense

Dec 3rd, 2005 2:07 am | By

A couple of passages from the president of the Royal Society’s valedictory speech because they are so B&W.

In short, I guess that the same ill-understood circumstances that allow complex human societies to arise and persist also – and perhaps necessarily – have elements that are strongly antithetic to the values of the Enlightenment. What are these values? They are tolerance of diversity, respect for individual liberty of conscience, and above all recognition that an ugly fact trumps a beautiful theory or a cherished belief. All ideas should be open to questioning, and the merit of ideas should be assessed on the strength of the evidence that supports them and not on the credentials or affiliations of the individuals proposing

Read the rest


Dr Steve Steve

Dec 2nd, 2005 7:40 pm | By

Another brief item. Something I noticed yesterday when coding Meera’s wonderful article – on the Amazon page for Prophets Facing Backward there is, of all things in the world, a recommendation by (wait for it) Steve Fuller. What does he say?

This first detailed examination of postmodernism’s politically reactionary consequences should serve as a wake-up call for all conscientious leftists.

Uh…hello? This is the same Steve Fuller – the very same Steve Fuller, my darlings – who testified for the defense – for the ID side – at Dover a few weeks ago. So – uh – uh – what can one possibly wonder other than ‘why didn’t he heed his own advice?’ Why didn’t he hear his own wake-up … Read the rest



Contradiction thy Name is Horton Hess and Skaggs

Dec 2nd, 2005 7:21 pm | By

A small point, one I wanted to make the other day but I was out of time and had to run off. The Bobby J Collitch of Knollitch textbooks again. The one called Elements of Literature for Christian Schools, to be specific.

Twain’s skepticism was clearly not the honest questioning of a seeker of truth but the deliberate defiance of a confessed rebel…Throughout her [Emily Dickinson’s] life she viewed salvation as a gamble, not a certainty. Although she did view the Bible as a source of poetic inspiration, she never accepted it as an inerrant guide to life.

Okay – so what do these bozos – Ronald Horton, Donalynn Hess and Steven Skeggs – mean by ‘the honest questioning … Read the rest



Eve Garrard on Gearty on Ignatieff *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

It’s no good saying our rights must never be violated if respecting one right involves infringing another.… Read the rest



Stephen Eric Bronner on the Enlightenment *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Many on the left have come to consider the Enlightenment as imperialist and a form of domination.… Read the rest



Founder of the Ljubljana Lacanians *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Zizek grew up bingeing on philosophy books and Hollywood movies.… Read the rest



Ayn Rand’s Version of Utopianism *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

It’s not just capitalism that Rand makes ridiculous by her worship.… Read the rest



Garton Ash Talks to Hirsi Ali *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Right to free speech is under threat from people whose position is: if you say that, we will kill you. … Read the rest



Having a Higher Truth is Different from Lying *

Dec 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

And bullshitting is not the same as either.… Read the rest



Darkness at Noon

Dec 2nd, 2005 2:03 am | By

Normblog’s Writer’s Choice was by Pamela Bone the other day. I’ve linked to several of her columns in the Age here. She’s another one of these eccentrics who think women’s rights shouldn’t be just for the lucky people of the developed world.

On that drive across town Perowne sees three black figures, women in the body and face-covering burqas, huddled together on a pavement.
“He can’t help his distaste, it’s visceral. How dismal, that anyone should be obliged to walk around so entirely obliterated… And what would the relativists say, the cheerful pessimists from Daisy’s college? That it’s sacred, traditional, a stand against the fripperies of Western consumerism? But the men, the husbands… wear suits, or trainers and tracksuits, or

Read the rest