In a frivolous-Friday mood, The Guardian offers links to both credulous and skeptical material on crop circles.… Read the rest
Education does not rule out credulity
Sep 12th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMichael Shermer in Scientific American says the siren song of pseudoscience can be too alluring to resist.… Read the rest
Suspicion fills the gap
Sep 12th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe new president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science says the gap between scientists and the public leads to a widespread distrust of rational inquiry.… Read the rest
Teaching is not propaganda
Sep 11th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonEducation professor propounds eccentric notion that teachers may know more than students.… Read the rest
Blunt opinions
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Naipaul has always eschewed the rhetoric of marginality.’… Read the rest
Uncertain terrain
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSkeptic editor Michael Shermer explains the difference between science and pseudoscience, and explores the intermediate area where the jury is still out.… Read the rest
Perhaps not so radically different
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMargaret Talbot takes Carol Gilligan to task for her claim that there are radical differences between male and female minds.… Read the rest
Fantasy beats reason every time
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPhilosopher Simon Blackburn in despair at humanity’s capacity for self-deception.… Read the rest
Kennewick Man to be studied
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonA federal magistrate judge has ordered the US government to let scientists study the bones of Kennewick Man, an ancient skeleton discovered on the banks of the Columbia River.… Read the rest
End the excuses
Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIan Buruma argues that it is time that people stopped hiding behind a sloppy relativism as a way to excuse the inexcusable.… Read the rest
Get real about human nature
Sep 9th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSteven Pinker on the fears that lead to people embracing an erroneous conception of human nature.… Read the rest
Oxymoron?
Sep 4th, 2002 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe evolution of the scientific creationist.… Read the rest
Misunderstanding Richard Dawkins
Sep 1st, 2002 | By Jeremy StangroomIntroduction
Richard Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene is the kind of book
that changes the way that people look at the world. Its importance
is that it articulates a gene’s-eye view of evolution. According
to this view, all organisms, including human beings, are ‘survival
machines’ which have been ‘blindly programmed’ to preserve their
genes (see The Selfish Gene, p. v). Of course, extant
survival machines take a myriad of different forms – for example,
it is estimated that there are some three million different species
of insect alone – but they all have in common that they have been
built according to the instructions of successful genes; that
is, genes whose replicas in previous generations managed to get
themselves copied.
At … Read the rest