Disturbances in the field *

Sep 13th, 2002 | Filed by

In a frivolous-Friday mood, The Guardian offers links to both credulous and skeptical material on crop circles.… Read the rest



Education does not rule out credulity *

Sep 12th, 2002 | Filed by

Michael Shermer in Scientific American says the siren song of pseudoscience can be too alluring to resist.… Read the rest



Suspicion fills the gap *

Sep 12th, 2002 | Filed by

The new president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science says the gap between scientists and the public leads to a widespread distrust of rational inquiry.… Read the rest



Teaching is not propaganda *

Sep 11th, 2002 | Filed by

Education professor propounds eccentric notion that teachers may know more than students.… Read the rest



Blunt opinions *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

‘Naipaul has always eschewed the rhetoric of marginality.’… Read the rest



Uncertain terrain *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

Skeptic editor Michael Shermer explains the difference between science and pseudoscience, and explores the intermediate area where the jury is still out.… Read the rest



Perhaps not so radically different *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

Margaret Talbot takes Carol Gilligan to task for her claim that there are radical differences between male and female minds.… Read the rest



Fantasy beats reason every time *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

Philosopher Simon Blackburn in despair at humanity’s capacity for self-deception.… Read the rest



Kennewick Man to be studied *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

A federal magistrate judge has ordered the US government to let scientists study the bones of Kennewick Man, an ancient skeleton discovered on the banks of the Columbia River.… Read the rest



End the excuses *

Sep 10th, 2002 | Filed by

Ian Buruma argues that it is time that people stopped hiding behind a sloppy relativism as a way to excuse the inexcusable.… Read the rest



Get real about human nature *

Sep 9th, 2002 | Filed by

Steven Pinker on the fears that lead to people embracing an erroneous conception of human nature.… Read the rest



Oxymoron? *

Sep 4th, 2002 | Filed by

The evolution of the scientific creationist.… Read the rest



Misunderstanding Richard Dawkins

Sep 1st, 2002 | By Jeremy Stangroom

Introduction

Richard Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene is the kind of book
that changes the way that people look at the world. Its importance
is that it articulates a gene’s-eye view of evolution. According
to this view, all organisms, including human beings, are ‘survival
machines’ which have been ‘blindly programmed’ to preserve their
genes (see The Selfish Gene, p. v). Of course, extant
survival machines take a myriad of different forms – for example,
it is estimated that there are some three million different species
of insect alone – but they all have in common that they have been
built according to the instructions of successful genes; that
is, genes whose replicas in previous generations managed to get
themselves copied.

At … Read the rest