Hmm.
I disputed something trans activist mushy crouton said the other day.

I didn’t bother to say we don’t “celebrate” the kid’s unhappiness, because of course we don’t; that’s just typical hyperbole plus assumption. I simply underlined for the billionth time that things for girls are for girls. A 10-year-old who identifies as a transgender girl is a boy. (I wonder if that subhead is even accurate. Does the boy really idennify as a transgender girl as opposed to as a girl? Or did the Mirror just put it that way in an attempt to clarify the usual murk?)
Mushy responded with the usual fairness and restraint.

Oh no!!! What have I done?!?
Pause for laughter.
Is the child going to know about it? No. If the child did know about it, would the child react to it the way mushy did? No. Does the child understand this whole thing the way mushy does? No. Do children understand any of this the way adults do? No. Is mushy on the side of the angels in flattering and encouraging the transing of children? No times a million.
