Liberty for me but not for thee

Oh really, that’s interesting.

Maybe by “libertarian” they mean liberty for men? Or, more specifically still, for white men? I don’t think I’ve ever seen any Koch brothers advocacy for reform of our slavery-like prison regime. Or just rich white men perhaps? Liberty for Koch brothers and men like Koch brothers?

From Popular Information:

Other companies supporting the Republicans behind Alabama’s abortion ban

Koch Industries, run by the supposedly libertarian Koch brothers, donated $2,500 to Ainsworth, $1,500 to Chambliss, $1,500 to Ledbetter, and $2,000 to Reed.

Liberty is an awesome thing, but only rich white men really know how to use it. Everyone else has to be kept on a very tight leash.

7 Responses to “Liberty for me but not for thee”