All entries by this author

New improved atheism with added antagonism

Dec 7th, 2009 11:49 am | By

Quote for the day, from Oliver Kamm.

I reject – in the sense that I’m antagonistic towards them, not just that I don’t accept them – all religious claims to truth.

Precisely. That is no doubt what put the ‘new’ in ‘new atheism’ – the addition of antagonism to non-acceptance. The move from plain unbelief to unbelief plus dislike. The adoption of Kingsley Amis’s ‘Yes [I’m an atheist] but it’s more that I hate him.’ The brazen unapologetic frank hostility to all religious claims to truth, because they are religious claims to truth, and therefore not only worthless but also harmful, because religion is not the way to get at truth, and pretending it is just trains people to … Read the rest



The evolution of Robert Wright

Dec 6th, 2009 1:09 pm | By

When othering the ‘New’ atheists, there is no need to be too nice about accuracy. Robert Wright gives a demonstration of that to join the growing stack of such demonstrations from otherwise liberal commentators.

[T]he New Atheists’ main short-term goal wasn’t to turn believers into atheists, it was to turn atheists into New Atheists — fellow fire-breathing preachers of the anti-gospel. The point was to make it not just uncool to believe, but cool to ridicule believers.

The usual thing – exaggeration (to put it charitably), malicious rhetoric, sheer invention. (Who says the point was to make it cool to ridicule unbelievers?) Childish stuff – in Foreign Policy. What next, Rush Limbaugh writing for The Wilson Quarterly?

Even

Read the rest


Egypt, Islamism and the Niqab *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

Women fight for the right to blot themselves out.… Read the rest



Should Health Insurance Pay for Prayer? *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

And ‘spiritual treatment of the sick’?… Read the rest



Oliver Kamm is in Favour of a Vast Gaping Nullity *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

Where citizens can choose the good for themselves rather than be regimented into other people’s conception of it. … Read the rest



Are Atheists Really Fundamentalists? *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

No; they are open to any hypothesis, provided that it can be substantiated by evidence. … Read the rest



Robert Wright Preaches a Sermon on ‘New Atheism’ *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

It’s a crusade, a mission, an anti-gospel, and it’s ‘objectively’ right wing.… Read the rest



Brown Wants More ‘Faith Leaders’ in Lords *

Dec 6th, 2009 | Filed by

Gordon Brown wants to make the House of Lords ‘more representative of the nation’s religious diversity.’… Read the rest



Welcome back, your holiness

Dec 6th, 2009 11:35 am | By

I don’t understand New Labour.

[Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor] was poised to become the first Roman Catholic bishop in the Upper House since the Reformation, as part of a drive by the Prime Minister to appoint senior leaders of all the main faiths to sit alongside Church of England bishops. Privately, Gordon Brown had told the cardinal that he was keen for him to provide leadership in the Lords once he had secured backing from the Catholic Church.

Why? Why the hell? Do we really have to bother pointing out that Gordon Brown is the leader of the Labour party? Do we really have to bother pointing out that the Catholic church has not generally been seen as an ally … Read the rest



Dang commOnist muslims, they should all go to muslimville

Dec 5th, 2009 5:21 pm | By

So I guess Tennessee schools must not be very good – not if the mayor of Arlington is anything to go by. He’s on Facebook, so he shared some thoughts there.

Ok, so, this is total crap, we sit the kids down to watch ‘The Charlie Brown Christmas Special’ and our muslim president is there, what a load…..try to convince me that wasn’t done on purpose. Ask the man if he believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and he will give you a 10 minute disertation (sic) about it….w…hen the answer should simply be ‘yes’….”

See that’s why I’m not a big fan of religion and the claims it makes – I don’t like being told … Read the rest



Theocratic science

Dec 5th, 2009 12:21 pm | By

Austin Dacey points out an interesting document.

In 2006, ISESCO [the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization] published a Guide for the Incorporation of Reproductive Health and Gender Concepts into Islamic Education Curricula, obviously a critically important subject area where some scientific facts are in order. The Guide, which can be found on ISESCO’s Web site, is addressed to curriculum developers, textbook writers, and those responsible for training instructors in formal Islamic education for students aged six to nineteen. Its introduction stresses the need “to supply, at the proper time, adolescents with appropriate health information on the biological aspects within the framework of Islamic rulings and values” and emphasizes “the fact that Sharia, whether in its original or

Read the rest


Taliban Blow Up Mosque in Rawalpindi *

Dec 5th, 2009 | Filed by

37 people dead, including 17 children. But isn’t it only ‘the West’ that ‘kills Muslims’?… Read the rest



The Catholic Church Never Learns *

Dec 5th, 2009 | Filed by

After decades of covering up child abuse, it goes on doing just that.… Read the rest



Suicide’s Parents Say Bishop Should Go *

Dec 5th, 2009 | Filed by

When he tried to take up his case with the Limerick diocese, he was met with silence and bullying.… Read the rest



Ben Goldacre on Facilitated Communication *

Dec 5th, 2009 | Filed by

Almost all scientifically controlled studies showed that the facilitator was the author of the communication.… Read the rest



Austin Dacey on ‘Sharia-compliant Science’ *

Dec 5th, 2009 | Filed by

The Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization is somewhat oddly named…… Read the rest



More on Karen Armstrong *

Dec 4th, 2009 | Filed by

This is mysticism and metaphysical hand-waving raised to a truly objectionable level.… Read the rest



Top of Pope’s Agenda: ‘Battle Against Secularism’ *

Dec 4th, 2009 | Filed by

Surely there must be room for compromise between human rights and theocratic dogma?… Read the rest



Cardinal Egan’s Testimony, Unsealed at Last *

Dec 4th, 2009 | Filed by

All about defending the church, never about protecting the victims. Surprise!… Read the rest



We know our rights!

Dec 4th, 2009 11:32 am | By

The Vatican is restless, and fretful, and aggrieved. The Vatican thinks it’s all most unfair.

the Vatican is concerned about the way in which human rights are being used to regulate the activities of church organisations or to restrict religious displays in public places. For example, the decision of the European Court of Human Rights to order the removal of crucifixes from the walls of state schools in Italy was greeted with dismay by Catholics.

Why? What business do ‘Catholics’ have being dismayed about such a thing? Do the state schools belong to them? No. Do they have authority over state schools? No.* So what business would they have sticking their paraphernalia on the walls of classrooms in state … Read the rest