Headscarves and Secularism Clash *

Dec 12th, 2003 | Filed by

French commission of inquiry recommends banning very visible religious clothing, including crosses and headscarves.… Read the rest



Hitchens on Trotskyism, Principle, Resistance *

Dec 11th, 2003 | Filed by

‘It’s important to try and contain multitudes.’… Read the rest



Neocon Confusions *

Dec 11th, 2003 | Filed by

John Patrick Diggins on inadequate understandings of Communism and ‘the Islamic revolution.’… Read the rest



Retorts and Ripostes to Monbiot *

Dec 11th, 2003 | Filed by

Whose cult, whose media manipulation, whose naivete, whose agenda?… Read the rest



Why Was Said so Controversial? *

Dec 11th, 2003 | Filed by

Perhaps because he turned a blind eye to certain problems?… Read the rest



Immunisation against error

Dec 11th, 2003 | By

"People who tell you they’re not superstitious are lying."
Frankie Dettori, Jockey, Observer Magazine, 5 January 2002.

Since its birth in Ancient Greece, philosophy has sought the holy grail of
certain knowledge. In this respect, philosophy reflects a common human desire
to have things clear-cut. This desire can be satisfied – psychologically, if
not logically – through the adoption of beliefs which are immunised against
the very possibility of error.

Dettori’s assertion about superstition is a striking example. He believes that
everyone is superstitious. The problem is, of course, that some people claim
not to be. If, however, he adopts the maxim "People who tell you they’re
not superstitious are lying," then no such avowals count as evidence against… Read the rest



Splinter Groups

Dec 10th, 2003 9:40 pm | By

Something interesting here from the Guardian. I’m not entirely sure (well not sure at all really) what to make of it, because I’ve heard George Monbiot say very silly things, and I’ve read very sensible things in spiked. That’s why we link to spiked now and then, and once at their invitation re-published an article of theirs. A good article it was, too. But then again, as I’ve said before, the free market agenda is not my agenda, and I’m not particularly eager to assist the agenda of people who want the market to decide all disputes in its own interest.

But I also don’t want such thoughts to inhibit me from linking to articles I think are good … Read the rest



Philip Stott Answers Monbiot *

Dec 10th, 2003 | Filed by

If the Guardian won’t cover science well, then spiked will have to do.… Read the rest



From Trotskyist Splinter Group to Neocon Ring? *

Dec 10th, 2003 | Filed by

George Monbiot wonders what links the Institute of Ideas, spiked, and other entities.… Read the rest



A Whiff of Gujarat in Houston? *

Dec 10th, 2003 | Filed by

Are tensions between Hindus and Muslims showing up in a US city?… Read the rest



Sense Prevails *

Dec 10th, 2003 | Filed by

Mother freed in ‘cot-death’ case.… Read the rest



Right to Life for a Foetus? *

Dec 10th, 2003 | Filed by

European abortion laws under threat?… Read the rest



Emotionally Biased Is It

Dec 9th, 2003 9:19 pm | By

There was an “article in the Guardian last week about requests from doctors who worked with Andrew Wakefield, the scientist whose research prompted the MMR controversy, not to show the program.

A former colleague of the scientist at the centre of the row claims the programme will endanger children’s lives by fostering doubts about the triple vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella…One of the doctors who has worked with Dr Wakefield wrote to Jane Lighting, Five’s chief executive, asking her not to transmit it. The doctor, a co-author of the original Lancet paper that provoked the controversy, says in the letter that the film is undeniably good drama, but it unacceptably and dangerously blurs the border between truth and

Read the rest


Doctors Say MMR Film is Inaccurate *

Dec 9th, 2003 | Filed by

‘Emotionally biased but not factually biased’ – oh well that’s all right then.… Read the rest



More on ‘Hear the Silence’ *

Dec 9th, 2003 | Filed by

A scientifically dishonest and emotionally manipulative film gives a groundless scare still more publicity.… Read the rest



The Difference Between Hegemony and Empire *

Dec 9th, 2003 | Filed by

The ideals of the Enlightenment belong to the left rather than the neocons.… Read the rest



Let a Thousand Opinions Bloom? *

Dec 9th, 2003 | Filed by

Is there a shortage of ill-founded, uninformed opinions?… Read the rest



A Treat

Dec 8th, 2003 9:40 pm | By

There’s been a mildly interesting, or interesting in parts, discussion at Crooked Timber about more obscure (or relatively obscure, slightly obscure, not really obscure but not on any of those Top 100 lists either) favourite books. I got in early with Randall Jarrell’s Pictures from an Institution, and it’s had more seconds than any other choice that I’ve noticed. Three, plus a link to a quotation on Terry Teachout’s blog, which I’ve just added to Quotations and will also offer up here. It is so generally apposite.

With her brightest students Miss Batterson was always on terms of uneasy, disappointed admiration; their work never seemed to be helping their development as much as the work of the stupider

Read the rest


Simon Blackburn Reviews Richard Dawkins *

Dec 8th, 2003 | Filed by

A superb writer and a valuable ally.… Read the rest



Realism and Anti-Realism *

Dec 8th, 2003 | Filed by

Grounding ethical realism independently of religion.… Read the rest