Mary Midgley on Not Getting a PhD *

Oct 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Is it possible to teach and learn philosophy in an atmosphere that is dominated by competition?… Read the rest



Norm Geras and Eve Garrard on Joanna Bourke *

Oct 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Bourke’s views deploy the very moral opposition she is complaining about.… Read the rest



Arguing Over Whose Victims Can Be Counted *

Oct 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Historical simplifications have long provided a consensus about the ‘good war.’… Read the rest



Cooing is a Human Rights Violation *

Oct 4th, 2005 | Filed by

Babies ‘are little people like you and me’ and don’t want to be bloody stared at ok so piss off!… Read the rest



Mental Blocking

Oct 3rd, 2005 9:24 pm | By

It’s outrageous. Something ought to be done about it. ‘College’ in the US apparently has the unmitigated gall to teach things that conflict with Christianity. Isn’t that illegal?

Spend a couple of days at the workshop and it becomes clear that, for many of these students, college is fraught with peril. There is the pressure to party, to drink, to have sex. There is also the subtle pressure to conform to a non-Christian worldview. There are biology courses that ask students to accept evolution, which workshop organizers and most of the students reject as untrue and ungodly. There are literature courses that see any text, including the Bible, as open to multiple interpretations. And there are philosophy classes that

Read the rest


The Bennett of Bennetts

Oct 3rd, 2005 7:30 pm | By

You might as well know. I don’t usually spill these things, I don’t just blurt them out, I keep myself to myself. I don’t make everyone a present of my secrets. I don’t bore you with my passions and adorations. I don’t feel it necessary to go public with everything. I don’t ‘share’ my every emotion. But you might as well know – there are few people I like as much as I like Alan Bennett. Not that I know him or anything – but everything I’ve read and seen by him, everything I know about him, everything I’ve heard him say; his voice, his plays, his journals, his readings, his performances – well, I just like them intensely, that’s … Read the rest



John Carey Reviews Alan Bennett *

Oct 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

The modern jargons we invent to keep reality at bay arouse his scorn.… Read the rest



The Reactionary Left *

Oct 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Left often seem the most conservative voices about everything from science to free speech.… Read the rest



Simon Schama Teases US Self-image *

Oct 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

He has dared to mock America’s claim to have been founded on the idea of freedom. … Read the rest



Christianity Camp *

Oct 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Where students are inoculated against rational thought.… Read the rest



What Colour Are Your Specs?

Oct 2nd, 2005 10:30 pm | By

At some point in the past day or two, while pondering the latest upsurge in the Freud debate, I was inspired to look up ‘hysteria’ in The Penguin Dictionary of Critical Theory. I was a little surprised at what I found.

A form of neurosis for which no physical diagnosis can be found and in which the symptoms presented are expressive of an unconscious conflict. In conversion hysteria, the symptoms usually take a somatic form (hysterical paralysis, irritation of the throat, coughs)…Hysteria has been explained in many different ways over the centuries; the most influential aetiology or causal explanation to have been put forward in the twentieth century is that supplied by Freud’s psychoanalysis.

There’s a problem with that. … Read the rest



Prestige is as Prestige Does

Oct 2nd, 2005 7:41 pm | By

Part two of this review of Simon Blackburn’s Truth says some peculiar and rather ill-natured things, and also some silly ones. Some of the things are all three at once.

In Truth, the hostility to the unnamed relativist so overflows at points as to make her sound more like a solipsist, a nihilist, or even a willful and demented child. I spent a number of years in and around English departments and certainly met plenty of nudniks and witnessed my share of bizarre seminar discussions. But never once did I meet the shameless knave that Blackburn describes.

Well – bully for you, one feels like saying. But that doesn’t mean they don’t exist, does it. (Black swans! Dingdingding!) We … Read the rest



Slate on Simon Blackburn on Truth Part 2 *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Reviewer plays amateur shrink, cites prestige, wounds to ego. Err…… Read the rest



Slate on Simon Blackburn on Truth *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Stephen Metcalf thinks Blackburn is inventing those postmodernists.… Read the rest



Feng Shui Called Fake Science in China *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Nanjing University withdraws plan to co-sponsor training in Feng shui after protests.… Read the rest



Pray for Secular Education *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Drill in unquestioned acceptance of ‘holy books’ also a problem.… Read the rest



Nick Cohen on Luck, the NHS, and Class *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

‘From the BBC to the British Museum, everyone in a position of cultural power is resolutely anti-elitist.’… Read the rest



Not of an Age, But for All Time *

Oct 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

And not British, but international. The toast: Will Shakespeare.… Read the rest



In Full Bloom

Oct 1st, 2005 6:30 pm | By

This review of Harold Bloom’s latest bit of vatic wisdom is good fun. I like and value Bloom’s efforts to preverve and convey enthusiasm for literature, but I find the actual books in which he does so unendurably irritating. He’s irritating in the same kind of way Paglia is; I wonder if he taught her to be irritating in that way, or if she taught him, or if they taught each other, or if they’re both that way by nature. They both make flat unargued unsupported assertions when they ought to be arguing. Take it or leave it. Yeah, I’ll leave it, thanks.

In spite of his popularity and productivity, however, Mr. Bloom remains an odd candidate for the mantle

Read the rest


Female Dogs

Oct 1st, 2005 6:01 pm | By

Women, eh. What is their problem? Why do they keep insisting on being born women? Isn’t it kind of obvious what a bad career choice that is? So why do they keep doing it? It’s so stupid that no punishment can be too severe for it. This being a woman thing has got to be stamped out. And by golly in some places in this world people are doing their best. Widows starve along with their children, because obviously they can’t be allowed to do anything else, because that would be immodest, and violate someone’s honour. So starve, bitch.

In a bleak and run-down part of eastern Kabul, aid workers call out to a group of poor women waiting for

Read the rest