Chris Mooney on Abductive Reasoning *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Susan Clancy investigates how otherwise sane people come to accept abduction accounts.… Read the rest



Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf Winning Election in Liberia *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Has 59% of vote. Inexplicably, BBC uses epithet in headline.… Read the rest



Navid Shahzad on Amartya Sen *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Sen continues to stretch his prodigious talent as professor of both philosophy and economics at Harvard.… Read the rest



Amartya Sen on Science, Argument and Scepticism *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Dismayed that links between heterodoxy and scientific creativity get so little attention.… Read the rest



Ask Philosophers *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Questions. It helps them get out more.… Read the rest



Henri Mensonge Challenges the Coital Cogito *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

He out-Foucaulted Foucault, out Derridaed Derrida, and out-Deleuzed-and-Guattaried Deleuze and Guattari.” … Read the rest



Run to P.O.: Stamp ‘Offensive’ to Hindus is Off *

Nov 10th, 2005 | Filed by

Royal Mail now recognizes it should have consulted (read groveled) further.… Read the rest



Le livre noir

Nov 9th, 2005 11:55 pm | By

If you read French, do explore the website for le livre noir de la psychanalyse. It’s highly interesting. There is this page where Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen answers ‘internautes’ for instance. Maybe I can translate a little…

Internaute: Can one say that religion, psychoanalysis, and Coke are products that work and that sell well? MB-J: Thomas Szasz wrote a luminous, decisive book on that question. in which he compares the marketing of psychoanlysis to that of Coca-Cola. I’m entirely in agreement with his analysis.

Religion, psychoanalysis, and Coke – I like that. (Appropriate, too, since Siggy was a coker.)… Read the rest



Interpretation

Nov 9th, 2005 8:23 pm | By

Sometimes it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that people can’t always see what’s in front of them. However obvious it is. However frantically it jumps up and down right in front of them. However hard it punches them in the face, however red and dripping the clothes it wears, however loud it screams, however charred the flesh, however choking the smoke.

Not that they don’t notice that something is there. But what they – some people, sometimes – have a hard time making out in the fog is a possibility about what the something is. They see the something there – all red and jumping and punching as it is – and they notice it – but they don’t always … Read the rest



Kansas Board of Education Blows It *

Nov 9th, 2005 | Filed by

Rules 6 to 4 that science classes in public schools should include teaching of ID.… Read the rest



Legal Equality and de Facto Racism *

Nov 9th, 2005 | Filed by

It is not the law that decides every aspect of daily life: people do. They’re not always colour-blind.… Read the rest



E O Wilson on Biology or Religion *

Nov 9th, 2005 | Filed by

The formulation of intelligent design is a default argument advanced in support of a non sequitur.… Read the rest



Clean Sweep of ID Proponents *

Nov 9th, 2005 | Filed by

Repudiation of first school district in US to order introduction of ID in a science class curriculum.… Read the rest



Yesss! *

Nov 9th, 2005 | Filed by

Dover, Pennsylvania school board voted out of office.… Read the rest



Was Freud a Pseudoscientist?

Nov 9th, 2005 | By Frank Cioffi

The following is an extract from an essay titled “Are Freud’s Critics Scurrilous?”, translated and published in Le livre noir de la psychoanalyse (Editions des Arènes).

WAS FREUD A PSEUDOSCIENTIST?: ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTION

‘He thought it wrong of Rank to propagate ideas that had not been properly tested.’ (Sigmund Freud: Life and Work, E. Jones, 1957, Vol.3 p.71)

It is a pity that the word science was ever introduced into the dispute over Freud’s claims to knowledge, though it is worth remembering that the term was introduced by Freud himself and that his critics employed it in order to counter his pretensions It would spare readers much tiresome rationalisation of Freud’s deficiencies if it were clearly understood … Read the rest



Carping

Nov 9th, 2005 2:49 am | By

Small point. Very small. Small, picky, fussy point. Obsessive point. Small, minor, not that important in the great scheme of things point. So sue me, I make small points sometimes. So I’m not cosmic.

Guy named Sebastian Rotella in the LA Times, an article on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Minor point.

Working into the evening in a well-guarded office in parliament, Ali retains the elegance and charisma that propelled her from refugee to political star. She wears a black pantsuit and sweater on a small, slender frame. She has oval eyes in a long, delicate face set off by pearl earrings.

Okay okay okay, it’s a minor point, I’m sorry, but god it sounds so stupid. And in sounding that … Read the rest



Worries About Imams with Megaphones *

Nov 8th, 2005 | Filed by

Isolation of ghettos where Muslim law and outlook prevails is seen as a cause of the unrest.… Read the rest



The Assassin Failed to Silence Ayaan Hirsi Ali *

Nov 8th, 2005 | Filed by

She has forced the Dutch to confront questions about culture, tolerance and free speech.… Read the rest



Jonathan Freedland on Amos Oz *

Nov 8th, 2005 | Filed by

‘For most journalists it’s Orwell, but for me it’s Oz.’… Read the rest



Fuss Over Sunday Shopping *

Nov 8th, 2005 | Filed by

No, no, shop after work, or during lunch hour, or never.… Read the rest