Science and Religion

Jan 9th, 2006 10:52 pm | By

If you want to hear some thoroughly silly reactions to Dawkins on God, listen to the latest Saturday Review.

First you get a bit of soundtrack, of the cheery perky dense evangelical telling Dawkins what’s what.

Ted Haggart: ‘We fully embrace the scientific method, as American evangelicals – and we think, as time goes along, as we discover more and more facts, that we’ll learn more and more about how God created the heavens and the earth – ‘

Dawkins points out that the evidence shows the earth to be 4.5 billion years old, Haggart says (perkily, cheerily), ‘You know what you’re doing?’ and explains that he’s paying attention to just part of the scientific community, and that maybe … Read the rest



Carlin Romano Reviews a History of Astrology *

Jan 9th, 2006 | Filed by

‘A few bouts of “astrologese” and you’re ready to knock the wizard’s cap off the author’s head.’… Read the rest



Interview With Simon Critchley *

Jan 9th, 2006 | Filed by

Heidegger’s work has ‘a dangerous power that I try to inoculate myself against and always fail.’… Read the rest



Lancet Article on Female Abortion [registration] *

Jan 9th, 2006 | Filed by

10 million missing females, and the absolute number is likely to grow in the future.… Read the rest



Selective Abortion of Females in India *

Jan 9th, 2006 | Filed by

Half a million babies are aborted every year because they are girls, says Lancet study.… Read the rest



A Call for an End to ‘Faith’ Schools in Scotland *

Jan 9th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Religion and education should not be joined.’… Read the rest



Resistance is not Futile

Jan 8th, 2006 11:18 pm | By

The Herald on Dawkins on religion on channel 4.

This new two-part documentary, which begins on Channel 4 tomorrow, asserts that there is no safe or defensible middle ground between science and religion, its thesis being that even the moderate followers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity are deluded, defective and potentially dangerous…It is in this capacity that Dawkins travels to various theological flashpoints…challenging a full range of beliefs and their advocates. And for an ambassador, he is not particularly diplomatic. The programme takes its cue from a statement Dawkins made immediately after September 11, 2001: “[Religion is] lethally dangerous nonsense. Let’s now stop being so damned respectful!”

Well, we’ve tried diplomacy, and what has it gotten us? Only more … Read the rest



Marginal Comments

Jan 8th, 2006 7:31 pm | By

There are some oddities in this piece on books about how to read Derrida and Marx.

The assumption of Granta’s How to Read series is that readers will go on to read at least some of the works discussed. Including this author in a series of this sort, aimed at a “general reader”, invites an interesting question: should one read Derrida? Is his work important, something with which any intelligent person should be familiar? In the grand scheme of things, perhaps not, but the question is complicated. What might it mean to say that an author is important, not just in a particular field, but for society as a whole?

What, indeed? Surely it’s fairly obvious that one has … Read the rest



Self-censorship, Mental Torture, Provocation *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

‘The cartoons did nothing that transcends the cultural norms of secular Denmark.’… Read the rest



You’re Simply Not Allowed to Attack Religion *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

‘You can attack their politics or their football team, but not their faith.’… Read the rest



ID’s Big Problem: Who Designed the Designer? *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

Design is not a real alternative to chance at all because it raises an even bigger problem than it solves.… Read the rest



Be Careful in Interpreting Poll Results *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

Unlike scientists, the general public does not understand that belief takes no part in scientific thinking.… Read the rest



Oi, George, What About This Leaky Roof? *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

How easy is it for Galloway’s constituents to contact him? Vikram Dodd finds out.… Read the rest



When in Doubt, We Ditch Logic *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

Brain-imaging study finds that the higher the level of uncertainty, the more instinct, not logic, will rule.… Read the rest



How to Read Derrida and Marx *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Disconnected from political engagement, reading lacks urgency.’ It does?… Read the rest



Nick Cohen on ‘The Root of all Evil?’ *

Jan 8th, 2006 | Filed by

See the Colorado preacher lose his boyish charm.… Read the rest



Bunting

Jan 7th, 2006 9:52 pm | By

And there’s always dear Madeleine Bunting. How fondly I look back on her musings about how much happier ‘African’ lives are than those in the creepy dreary alienated consumerist West. How the people in the Democratic Republic of Congo must have chuckled if any of them were in a position – what with being so busy starving and being ill and dying and all – to find a Guardian and read her essay.

Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo is killing 38,000 people each month, says the Lancet medical journal. Most of the deaths are not caused by violence but by malnutrition and preventable diseases after the collapse of health services, the study said. Since the war began

Read the rest


Shouting the Loudest

Jan 7th, 2006 9:00 pm | By

The Economist tells us that racism and resentment haven’t gone away, they’ve just gotten more complex. Oh good. Old-fashioned white-on-black racism is old hat; now the happening thing is Caribbean children resenting Somali children and Sikhs resenting Muslims. So much more diverse and multiculti that way.

Kirk Dawes, a black former police officer who now runs a mediation service in Birmingham, commends the way in which the police and the council have purged overt racists from their ranks. But he criticises the way both have relied on “community leaders,” especially those of a fiery type, as interlocutors with ethnic minority groups. “There is a belief that those who shout the loudest can best solve the problems within their community,” Mr

Read the rest


Chatting

Jan 7th, 2006 6:16 pm | By

I love the hairdresser thing, don’t you?

In a splendid return to form, Demos has silenced rumours that it is all thunk out with a proposal that hairdressers be invited to shape local government policy…”Our research has led us to conclude that hairdressers are the most authentic voice on the high street,” says Demos’s Sam Hinton-Smith, “and that they should be given a formal role in urban policy-making.” Not only that. Hairdressers “act as counsellors and social workers”.

The most authentic voice on the high street – really? More authentic than the voice of the fishmonger? The traffic warden? The shopper for dinner and a newspaper and some lightbulbs and a DVD? The panhandler? The market surveyor? The random … Read the rest



Ex-editor of Gay and Lesbian Humanist Clarifies *

Jan 7th, 2006 | Filed by

Criticism of Islam was no harsher than criticism of all religions has been during magazine’s 25-year life.… Read the rest