Something Cyborgic in Academic/Biker Hybridity *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

Outlaw club: one that has refused Foucaultian regime of subjective normalization imposed by American Motorcyclist Association. … Read the rest



‘Speak’ Posts Workers’ Address on Website *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

Builders’ quarters could become the target of violent protests. … Read the rest



Blair Speaks Out in Support of Pro-Test *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

In March over 800 students, staff and members of the public marched in favour of Pro-Test.… Read the rest



Robert Winston Defends Animal Testing *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

‘Some…would have people believe that animal research does not work. This is simply a lie.’… Read the rest



UCL Provost Concerned Over Boycott *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

Freedom of inquiry fundamental to the global dissemination and enhancement of knowledge.… Read the rest



AUT Statement on NATFHE Vote *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

Free expression, open debate and unhampered dialogue are prerequisites of academic freedom.… Read the rest



NATFHE Backs Boycott of Israeli Academics *

May 31st, 2006 | Filed by

A boycott of Israeli Jewish academics and no one else in the world seems dubious.… Read the rest



Genuflect Genuflect Genuflect

May 30th, 2006 5:51 pm | By

The old ‘how do I look in this attitude’ problem again. The old ‘get me, I’m so transgressive’ problem again. Funny how persistent it is.

What chiefly surprised me about last winter’s list was its lack of any humor, any irony. The self-styled most important journal of theory was going to inform us – so it told us – what an objective method revealed about who the most important theorists were in its pages. How? By counting citations to theorists. Behind the rhetoric about discovering “the identity of our journal” lies an implicit assumption: If you’re cited in Critical Inquiry, you’re the best of the best. Sometimes the folks in Chicago get a little pumped…

If we like … Read the rest



Bipartisan Hostility to Science and Reason *

May 30th, 2006 | Filed by

The left mocks reason and so does the right, so what does that leave?… Read the rest



The List of – the Greatest Literary Theorists? *

May 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Hard to boast of ‘tendency to question received wisdom’ without seeming to have skipped a question.… Read the rest



Katha Pollitt: Honor Killing on the Installment Plan *

May 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Christian conservatives have a special reason to be less than thrilled about the HPV vaccine. … Read the rest



Anthony King on YouGov Poll on Animal Testing *

May 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Almost no one supports vandalising property, let alone death threats and grave-robbing.… Read the rest



Colin Blakemore on Animal Testing *

May 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Public not fooled by assertions that testing is unnecessary or positively dangerous for humans.… Read the rest



A Review

May 29th, 2006 8:48 pm | By

Another review. JS sent me the link. It’s…well it’s a good review. It sees the point, for one thing. That’s rewarding. Excuse me for just a second here – this is very cringe-making in a way – but I do want to say something.

In this book, Benson and Stangroom are wide-ranging in their knowledge and in the thinking about what they know, and so the book appears laid out almost like a collection of essays that are connected by the theme described above. Anthropology, evolutionary psychology and sociobiology, feminism, philosophies of various sorts, and the policies of Nazism are all touched on or addressed. Each chapter is interesting in its own right, but the background and source materials

Read the rest


Socratic Deformation

May 29th, 2006 8:12 pm | By

This review of Rousseau’s Dog is odd.

How silly can clever men be? For anyone on more than nodding acquaintance with university professors, the answer is clear: ‘very silly indeed’. For the fortunate majority denied first-hand experience, this account of the relationship between two of the wisest fools in Christendom will fill the gap.

Well, of course, clever university professors can be extremely silly, especially moderately clever ones who think they’re more than moderately clever, as moderately clever university professors often do, on account of spending several hours every week looking at the upturned faces of dear little undergraduates who know less than they do (see ‘Socratic deformation’ in The Dictionary of Fashionable Nonsense). But some are sillier than … Read the rest



Carole Angier Argues with Eidinow and Edmunds *

May 29th, 2006 | Filed by

They present the debate as between reason and feeling, and they choose feeling.… Read the rest



Credulous Review of Rousseau’s Dog *

May 29th, 2006 | Filed by

A ‘wonderfully readable account of two very silly men’ – Rousseau and Hume. Hmm.… Read the rest



Entelechy Journal Reviews Why Truth Matters *

May 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Claims the book is ‘beautifully written, and sprinkled with passages of both insight and literary value’.… Read the rest



Blasphemy Law Used for Intimidation in Pakistan *

May 29th, 2006 | Filed by

‘The sections of the penal code fail to define blasphemy; anyone can interpret them.’… Read the rest



Women Dissidents Abused in Iranian Prisons *

May 29th, 2006 | Filed by

‘For these people, religion is only a tool for dictatorship and abuse.’… Read the rest