His death is an occasion to remember the many victims of his state and international terrorism.… Read the rest
Thatcher ‘Greatly Saddened’ at Pinochet’s Death
Dec 11th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDiddums.… Read the rest
Pinochet Escapes Prosecution
Dec 11th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMore than 3,000 people were killed or ‘disappeared’ in his 17-year rule. … Read the rest
Theory and Practice of Literary (Mis)reading
Dec 11th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonOn Ziauddin Sardar on ‘Blitcon’.… Read the rest
Religious Convictions Have a Hard Edge
Dec 11th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRoy Hattersley on worship of a stern and vengeful god.… Read the rest
Depends who’s asking
Dec 10th, 2006 9:56 pm | By Ophelia BensonHitchens makes a very silly opening argument in this conspicuously silly piece, winsomely titled ‘Why Women Aren’t Funny’. (Is this part of his Kingsley Amis shtick? KA was brilliant, but the routine misogyny was hardly his funniest or most interesting bit.)
… Read the restHowever, there is something that you absolutely never hear from a male friend who is hymning his latest (female) love interest: “She’s a real honey, has a life of her own … [interlude for attributes that are none of your business] … and, man, does she ever make ’em laugh.” Now, why is this? Why is it the case?, I mean. Why are women, who have the whole male world at their mercy, not funny? Please do not
Aggressive mean naughty bad atheists
Dec 10th, 2006 9:40 pm | By Ophelia BensonAtheists are mean, says Nicholas Kristof. No they’re not, say Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett; you just think so because you’re used to religion’s special immunity. As Dawkins puts it:
Mr. Kristof has simply become acclimatized to the convention that you can criticize anything else but you mustn’t criticize religion. Ears calibrated to this norm will hear gentle criticism of religion as intemperate, and robust criticism as obnoxious.
Which is really not an ideal situation: it really does make it difficult for people to discuss the subject honestly. It’s a little worrying how many people are eager to join the chorus urging atheists to shut up – or to be less ‘obnoxious’ and ‘militant’ and ‘in … Read the rest
Duties to the public
Dec 10th, 2006 7:14 pm | By Ophelia BensonSome more on the conceptual issues involved in ideas such as equality, equal treatment, civil rights, public accommodation, and so on. Some comments by a dissenting justice in the Civil Rights Cases decision of 1883, in which the court killed the Civil Rights Act of 1875, an act by which Congress attempted to elaborate on and enforce the Fourteenth Amendment – Section 1 of which turned the US world upside down:
… Read the restAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
Roger Scruton Talks to the CBC
Dec 10th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘The most controversial but best-read philosopher in Britain’ – perhaps jet lagged.… Read the rest
Russell Jacoby Has Doubts About Arendt
Dec 10th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonBut makes an exception for Eichmann in Jerusalem.… Read the rest
Is Politics Merely Show Biz?
Dec 10th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe danger of a large diverse group is that the loudest voices will dominate and a herd mentality will take over.… Read the rest
Ian Hacking: Whose Body Is It?
Dec 10th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHow dead is brain-dead?… Read the rest
The Bishops are on the Prowl
Dec 10th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonA harmonious society is not best served by archbishops passing themselves off as a persecuted minority.… Read the rest
The right to choose your customers
Dec 10th, 2006 12:34 am | By Ophelia BensonWe have this on-going discussion about rights, about what they are, what we mean by them, what they aren’t or shouldn’t be or shouldn’t be thought to be, how they are justified, and the like. We have some commenters defending the idea that Christians do have rights to refuse service to gay people in public accommodations. They’re using arguments that have a certain familiarity. The ‘right to free association’ for instance. From a comment on ‘The fundamental right to say get outta my store’: ‘the right to free association. That’s the very same right denied in apartheid south africa or in the US under segregation or by many anti-union laws.’ Well, no, actually. It was the defenders of apartheid … Read the rest
Gay Life in the Middle East
Dec 9th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAn Israeli activist and a UK journalist report.… Read the rest
Corruption in Congress
Dec 9th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonA conspiracy to use ‘campaign contributions’ to bribe politicians.… Read the rest
An ‘Aggressive Secularist’ Speaks
Dec 9th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia BensonTerry Sanderson wonders if the Archbishop of York is fully in control of his faculties.… Read the rest
Robert McCrum on Sardar’s ‘Ludicrous Piece’
Dec 9th, 2006 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Planet Sardar is barely on any intellectual radar I’d care to consult.’… Read the rest
Contradictions? What contradictions?
Dec 8th, 2006 6:42 pm | By Ophelia BensonBlair gave a speech on multiculturalism. (Maybe if he’s very good, next week he’ll be allowed to have a debate on the subject with Madeleine Bunting.) He said some slightly odd things…
Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and other faiths have a perfect right to their own identity and religion, to practice their faith and to conform to their culture. This is what multicultural, multi-faith Britain is about. That is what is legitimately distinctive.
But when it comes to our essential values – belief in democracy, the rule of law, tolerance, equal treatment for all, respect for this country and its shared heritage – then that is where we come together, it is what we hold in common…
But … Read the rest
Vociferous aggressive secularists for WAR
Dec 8th, 2006 6:24 pm | By Ophelia BensonIn the summer, the publication of Amartya Sen’s book, Identity and Violence, was greeted with delight by many reviewers and commentators…He was promptly adopted by the lobby of vociferous aggressive secularists who regard all faith in the public sphere as evidence of some sinister plot.
No, actually, that’s not what we regard all ‘faith’ in the public sphere as, we regard it as an inherently dangerous influence on politics, law, human rights and other such public influences that shape how we all get to live our lives. Get it right, Madders.… Read the rest