Pascal Bruckner Replies to Buruma, Garton Ash *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Preferring modern fundamentalism to terrorism runs the risk of having both.… Read the rest



Interview with Bernard-Henri Lévy *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

We reject the horrors of our past: That should be enough. That’s an identity. … Read the rest



Raymond Bradley: The Rivalry Between Religions *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Right at the outset, one is faced with a huge number of possible candidates for belief.… Read the rest



Child Abuse Hidden for Fear of ‘Dishonour’ *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Most people surveyed said they felt the authorities did not understand their religion and culture.… Read the rest



Fundamentalists Play Moral Cops, Executioners *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Group of men accuse woman of affair, then stab her to death.… Read the rest



Police to Receive ‘Faith Education’ *

Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by

‘As part of plans to improve the handling of religiously aggravated crimes.’ Improve how?… Read the rest



Some items loosely strung together

Mar 27th, 2007 5:44 pm | By

A new(ish) blog by a philosophy type: Delight Springs.

David Thompson points out that we’re allowed to dislike any religion. Yes, even that one.

Oliver Kamm also comments on Charlie Hebdo and free speech: “Those who claim that the state of their religious sensibilities is a justification for punishing speech have been rightly rebuffed.”

Stephen Law has an amusing post on pseudo-profundity (gee, what do you suppose put that idea in his head?).

If all your jargon is defined using other jargon, no one will ever be able to figure out exactly what you mean (though your devotees may think they know). And the fact that buried within your pseudo-profundities are one or true truisms will give

Read the rest


Making the case in terms anyone can agree with

Mar 27th, 2007 2:20 pm | By

A comment on this post snagged my attention.

It depends on the context. But let’s stick to the political for now. In that arena, you make progress by gathering allies, not making enemies – although you will always have to make some of them. So you make the case in terms that anyone can agree with, even if they’re not atheists. I was involved in a pamphlet advocating restrictions on religious schools, and that’s just what we did. We didn’t premise the case on religion’s falsity, but issues of social cohesion, autonomy and so on.

Well, it depends. Even in politics you don’t always make the case in terms that anyone can agree with, because it depends on what the … Read the rest



Sounds Like a Fun Evening *

Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by

Dawkins, Grayling, Hitchens against religion; Neuberger, Scruton, Spivey for.… Read the rest



Grayling on Why Atheists Resist *

Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by

As knowledge replaced animism, deities became invisible, receding to mountain tops and then to the sky. … Read the rest



Science Weekly *

Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by

Psychopharmacologist David Nutt; Grayling on God, creationism and the attraction of pseudoscience.… Read the rest



Islamist Organizations and ‘Honour’ Killings *

Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by

‘It is allowing the man to say “my religion says you must behave this way”.’… Read the rest



Wiccan Says She Was Sacked for ‘Faith’ *

Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by

‘Saying, “I can train you to put spells” is a problem.’… Read the rest



Confidence

Mar 27th, 2007 10:08 am | By

I hesitate to link to the Daily Mail, but this is interesting.

Islamic extremists are fuelling the spread of “honour” based violence against women in Britain, the country’s most senior Muslim prosecutor has warned…”When you talk to women who are victims of this type of behaviour you often find that they will say that their husbands or fathers have been radicalised in the way that they think about women,” he said. “They will use Islam as a justification for telling women how to behave and for punishing them. There is no religious justification for forcing your children to marry or harming them because they behave in a particular way, but there are people out there who are using their

Read the rest


Bal Patil Asks, Whither Globalisation? *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

18,000 children die every day of hunger and malnutrition; 85 million go to bed hungry every night.… Read the rest



Colin McGinn: Michael Frayn’s The Human Touch *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

Amiable ramble is quite unconvincing in its main thesis and seems to rest on some obvious errors.… Read the rest



Mina Ahadi Says ‘Stop Calling us Muslims’ *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

When they put us all in one sack, they make the leaders of Islamic organisations our leaders.… Read the rest



GP/Health Journalist: Homeopathy Not so Bad *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

‘Even the fiercest critics of homeopathy will agree that it does no harm.’ Oh really?… Read the rest



Tragic Woman Still Sexless in 2007! *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

Can no one help her? Will it take another four years?… Read the rest



Despondent Woman Too Busy for Sex in 2003 *

Mar 26th, 2007 | Filed by

‘By the time people have been to the shopping mall and watched all the television they want, there is not much time for sex.’… Read the rest