An Atheist Writes a Commentary on the Bible *

Mar 2nd, 2009 | Filed by

Even if the principles of morality were in need of foundations, the Bible would be too nefarious for the purpose. … Read the rest



Life in Kabul, again

Mar 2nd, 2009 11:51 am | By

Paween Mushtakhel loved acting, and was very successful at it; now she wishes she had never discovered the stage.

In December her husband was murdered by unknown gunmen outside their home after defying months of telephone warnings to stop his wife appearing on television. “I killed my husband with my acting,” [she] says…She has spent the past three months in hiding, fearful for her life and those of her two young children. Her only option, she says, is to flee the country. She is not alone. There is an unease bordering on dread among many working women as the restrictions of the Taleban era begin to encroach again on the relative liberalism of Afghanistan’s cities. “The atmosphere has changed,”

Read the rest


Once you eat the cake, it’s gone

Mar 2nd, 2009 10:25 am | By

Well which is it? Cherie Blair seems to want to have it both ways, or all ways. She says Christians are ‘marginalized in society.’

‘Everywhere you look today churches are being closed, Christians are often being marginalised and faith is something few people like to discuss openly.’…She added: ‘People used to suggest that Tony and George would actually pray together and that never happened of course.’

But why ‘of course’? If it’s worrying or upsetting or unfair that ‘Christians are often being marginalised’ then why is it ‘of course’ that Tony and George would not actually pray together?

The problem here is that there are very good reasons for citizens to be alarmed if their heads of state are … Read the rest



800 words, nothing too harsh

Mar 1st, 2009 12:53 pm | By

Nicholas Beale notes on his blog, ‘Quite a favourable review in the FT by Julian Baggini.’ The funny thing about that is that Julian said in his Talking Philosophy post that the FT rejected his first two drafts partly because they were ‘not sufficiently even-handed’ – which, when you compare the review to the TP post, clearly means not favourable enough. Yes it’s quite a favourable review in the FT, because the FT demanded a quite favourable review.

That’s funny in light of Beale’s post but it’s annoying in light of reality and justice. It’s annoying that media outlets commission reviews and then tell the reviewer what to say. It’s annoying that this book by Polkinghorne and Beale got … Read the rest



Philosophers Hate an Untenable Dualism *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Is there a principled difference between memories and notebook entries?… Read the rest



Julian Barnes on Eric Blair *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

The national Orwell is that of plain writing and moral clarity, but things are never so simple.… Read the rest



Japan Tobacco Offers Perks to Researchers *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Fun evening for parliamentary aides as legislation to ban the display of cigarettes is before MPs.… Read the rest



Ben Goldacre on Datamining for Terrorists *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Even with the most brilliantly accurate test imaginable, your risk of false positives increases to unworkably high levels.… Read the rest



Bobby Jindal the Exorcist *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Hey, he’s governor of Louisiana, a state full of charismatic Christians and religious hysterics.… Read the rest



A little warning

Mar 1st, 2009 11:49 am | By

Jeremy is going to move B&W to a different server this week (now you know why we needed the extra cache, just to make triply sure), so B&W may disappear for a day or two. Now you know this so you won’t turn pale and faint if it happens.… Read the rest