DRC: police chief admits role in murder of Chebeya

Jun 6th, 2010 | Filed by

Floribert Chebeya, head of the human rights group Voix des Sans Voix, was found dead on Wednesday.… Read the rest



Australia: doctors oppose FGM *

Jun 5th, 2010 | Filed by

That includes ‘ritual nicking.’… Read the rest



Always look on the bright side of FGM

Jun 5th, 2010 12:11 pm | By

Nicholas Kristof tells off Ayaan Hirsi Ali because of course he knows far more about Islam than she does.

To those of us who have lived and traveled widely in Africa and Asia, descriptions of Islam often seem true but incomplete.

Including, apparently, descriptions by people who grew up immersed in Islam, genitally mutilated under Islam, beaten up by their teachers of Islam, issued death threats from adherents of Islam. The descriptions are true – but Kristof wants more. He wants to hear about the pretty calligraphy.

The repression of women, the persecution complexes, the lack of democracy, the volatility, the anti-Semitism, the difficulties modernizing, the disproportionate role in terrorism — those are all real. But if those were the

Read the rest


More tinkling cymbal

Jun 5th, 2010 11:42 am | By

But that’s not all, of course. Odone has more to say than that. Odone has a lot to say.

First of all she complains that Channel 4 chose, to present a show on paedophile priests, a guy who is “an avowed atheist” and who has “no knowledge of the contemporary Catholic Church,” as if both are obvious disqualifications for presenting a show on paedophile priests. Her thinking seems to be that you have to believe in god and be an expert on the Catholic church in order to present a tv show on a concentration of child rapists in a particular profession. In other words her thinking seems to be that only someone who starts out with some sympathy … Read the rest



A duel at sunrise

Jun 5th, 2010 10:58 am | By

Seriously. Cristina Odone must feel very sure that Richard Dawkins won’t sue her for libel, or she wouldn’t say “Richard Dawkins is responsible for peddling a lot of lies about faith” in her blog at The Telegraph, and the Telegraph wouldn’t let her, either. She wouldn’t just casually risk a money-devouring and time-devouring lawsuit just for the hell of it, or for the tiny fun of accusing Dawkins of peddling lies in a Telegraph blog. She writes for the national press in the UK, so she can’t possibly be unaware of the UK’s insane libel laws and how they are used. She can’t possibly be unaware of Simon Singh and the BCA and the word “bogus” – so it’s … Read the rest



Cristina Odone demonstrates Catholic liberality *

Jun 5th, 2010 | Filed by

Says Dawkins “peddles lies.” Clearly she knows he won’t sue for libel, so she feels free to libel him.… Read the rest



Kristof’s strident review *

Jun 5th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Hirsi Ali denounces Islam with a ferocity that I find strident, potentially feeding religious bigotry.’… Read the rest



Andrew Roberts on Nicholas Kristof on Ayaan Hirsi Ali *

Jun 5th, 2010 | Filed by

For true stridency one should read Kristof’s almost unhinged response to Hirsi Ali’s book.… Read the rest



My owner knows what’s best for me

Jun 4th, 2010 4:32 pm | By

There’s Rowdha Yousef, who is worried about this alarming trend for Saudi women to start making a few faint gestures toward acting like human beings. She is outraged.

With 15 other women, she started a campaign, “My Guardian Knows What’s Best for Me.” Within two months, they had collected more than 5,400 signatures on a petition “rejecting the ignorant requests of those inciting liberty” and demanding “punishments for those who call for equality between men and women, mingling between men and women in mixed environments, and other unacceptable behaviors.”

Her guardian knows what’s best for her, therefore she wants to help see to it that all women will continue to be required to have guardians whether they want them or … Read the rest



But is there a common ground to be found?

Jun 4th, 2010 4:08 pm | By

Eli Horowitz of Rust Belt Philosophy finds the Templeton Foundation and its everlasting questions irksome. The World Science Festival has its Science ‘N’ Faith panel, as we know, which asks rilly deep questions:

For all their historical tensions, scientists and religious scholars from a wide variety of faiths ponder many similar questions—how did the universe begin? How might it end? What is the origin of matter, energy, and life?

Ooh yeah, how, how? Eli adds a few more deep questions.

How many years can some people exist before they’re allowed to be free? Who put the “bop” in the “bop-shoo-bop-shoo-bop”? Why do we drive on parkways and park on driveways? What’s eating Gilbert Grape? Who framed Roger Rabbit?

Read the rest


More irregular verbs

Jun 4th, 2010 11:29 am | By

Jason Rosenhouse has an excellent post on the science ‘n’ faith panel at the World Science Festival.

He notes that Chad Orzel says, “The simple fact is that people with fixed and absolute views do not make for an interesting conversation,” and comments

Right, because it’s only New Atheists that have fixed and absolute viewpoints. When someone like Francisco Ayala writes,

I contend that both — scientists denying religion and believers rejecting science — are wrong. Science and religious beliefs need not be in contradiction. If they are properly understood, they cannot be in contradiction because science and religion concern different matters.

there is nothing fixed or absolute in his views? To declare bluntly that any conception of

Read the rest


Peter Tatchell to do C4 documentary on pope *

Jun 4th, 2010 | Filed by

Widdecombe, Odone, Jack Valero of Opus Dei pitch fits.… Read the rest



Vatican wants to engage with atheists *

Jun 4th, 2010 | Filed by

But only with the ‘noble’ ones, not the polemical kind – no Onfray or Dawkins or Hitchens thanks.… Read the rest



The Nation looks at Templeton *

Jun 4th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Scholars aren’t quite sure what the “science of Godly Love” means, exactly.’… Read the rest



The modes of inquiry are, to be sure, very different

Jun 3rd, 2010 12:29 pm | By

The World Science Festival is offering a “Faith and Science” panel, funded by the Templeton Foundation, of course. Chad Orzel disagrees with Jerry Coyne and Sean Carroll on the wrong-headedness of this. Sean points out

there is a somewhat obvious omission of a certain viewpoint: those of us who think that science and religion are not compatible. And there are a lot of us! Also, we’re right. A panel like this does a true disservice to people who are curious about these questions and could benefit from a rigorous airing of the issues, rather than a whitewash where everyone mumbles pleasantly about how we should all just get along.

To which Orzel responds

I’m not convinced you need

Read the rest


Look out! Another slippery slope! *

Jun 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

Privacy and health concerns, moral or religious convictions, sensitivity training, indoctrinate, myths of the homosexual movement.… Read the rest



Saudi woman bravely resists reform *

Jun 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

Started campaign “My Guardian Knows What’s Best for Me.”… Read the rest



Slippery slope! Watch out! *

Jun 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

Disability campaigner wants to impose her unreasonable fears on everyone.… Read the rest



ASA rules against church miracle cure claims *

Jun 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

We noted that the ad stated “… I have seen the dead raised and I have witnessed nearly all types of healing miracles.”… Read the rest



An extended chat with Hitchens *

Jun 2nd, 2010 | Filed by

‘There are all kinds of stupid people that annoy me but what annoys me most is a lazy argument.’… Read the rest