Conference on political Islam v women’s rights

Jul 20th, 2010 | By Homa Arjomand

International Campaign Against Shari’a Court in Canada

Conference on

Effect of globalization of political Islam on Women’s Rights, in connection with
Polygamy, Neqab and Honor Killing

The problem of legal pluralism and cultural relativism with respect to women’s Rights

Discussion on separation of religion from state

Confirmed Speakers:

Social and political activist, founder of the Organization for Women’s Liberation – Iran, founder of  Mansoor Hekmat foundation, producer and host of several TV programs in Farsi and English on New Channel TV, a satellite TV broadcasting into Iran under the name of  No to Political Islam, co-founder of  the Center for Women and Socialism, editor of Medusa, the director of Radio International, a radio station broadcasting into Iran.

Azar Majedie… Read the rest



Catholic organization pays teacher at U of Illinois *

Jul 20th, 2010 | Filed by

The St. John’s Catholic Newman Center hires and pays instructors of Catholic church history at a public university.… Read the rest



Terry Glavin talks to Majabeen, a future doctor *

Jul 20th, 2010 | Filed by
Before she came to the orphanage, Majabeen had never been to school, so even now, she is only in Grade 6. But she is determined.… Read the rest


Terry Glavin on universalism v culturalism *

Jul 20th, 2010 | Filed by

On the one hand Lauryn Oates, Sima Samar, Alaina Podmorow; on the other hand, “yes but.”… Read the rest



A high risk of swallowing water

Jul 20th, 2010 8:39 am | By

The problem here is not just that state schools shouldn’t be fussing around with particular religions and their rules and fasts, though of course it is that. It’s also, frankly, that state schools (or for that matter any schools) shouldn’t be helping to implement rules and fasts that are fundamentally unhealthy and unsafe. It’s a really bad idea to forbid hydration for extended periods (such as dawn to dusk), so schools should at least abstain. They shouldn’t anxiously help religions to enforce stupid dangerous “rules” of that kind. That’s not their job, and it’s a dereliction of their responsibility for the students’ safety while on the premises.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council has issued an 11-page Ramadan guide for schools to help

Read the rest


Council tells schools how to enforce Ramadan *

Jul 20th, 2010 | Filed by

Stoke-on-Trent City Council issues an 11-page Ramadan guide for schools; no swimming lessons lest students swallow water.… Read the rest



Science and religion as “ways of knowing” *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

If induction can’t be used to prove an absolute, is that really a problem that religion can solve?… Read the rest



If speaking the truth is offensive, let us offend

Jul 19th, 2010 | By Lauryn Oates

On July 15, Aruna Papp, author of a recently released report, “Culturally-driven violence against women: A growing problem in Canada’s immigrant communities” published by the Frontier Centre for Public Policy’s study, wrote in an editorial in the Vancouver Sun:

Problematically, most advocates and activists for female victims of abuse shy away from challenging the immigrant communities to examine their own traditions and cultural values in explaining the violence in their homes.

The ideology of multiculturalism, even among the most well-meaning advocates for female equality, tends to preclude any discussion of cultural values and traditions. Such advocates are afraid of being seen as “colonialist” and try to avoid a perceived “racialization” of an entire ethnic community.

Papp writes in the … Read the rest



Ann Widdecombe’s huge bundle of straw

Jul 19th, 2010 11:11 am | By

Ann Widdecombe explains it all to the New Statesman.

 Under the last government we saw a raft of law, principally equality law, which specifically set out to crush religious freedom and to crush freedom of conscience. There is an immense difference between being told that you must not discriminate against something and being told that you must promote it.

Like what, the NS asks. Poofters, of course. Poofter adoptions, poofters in your B&B. Half the population are non-believers, the NS says feebly; not a bit of it, says Widdecombe, most are Christians and what they say goes. No, really, the NS bleats; Widdecombe says not at all.

People may say they’re not religious, and when Richard Dawkins says he’s

Read the rest


When men make lists of sexiest scientists *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

That sends a message about what the point of women is.… Read the rest



Carlin Romano sniggers at Hitchens *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

What an ugly mind is here displayed.… Read the rest



New Statesman interviews Ann Widdicombe *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

“I left the Church of England because there was a huge bundle of straw. The ordination of women was the last straw.”… Read the rest



A heap of illiberal dreck in the New Statesman *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

Bryan Appleyard explains why religion is mandatory.… Read the rest



Terry Sanderson defends secularism *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

Secularism protects us all from the authoritarianism that is characteristic of religion when it has temporal power.… Read the rest



Theology

Jul 18th, 2010 5:36 pm | By

Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl says it’s not that the church disrespects women. Oh fuck no, said the chair of the US bishops’ Committee on Doctrine, the church thinks women are just lovely.

Noting that women hold a variety of church leadership positions in parishes and dioceses, Archbishop Wuerl said, “The church’s gratitude toward women cannot be stated strongly enough.”

“Women offer unique insight, creative abilities and unstinting generosity at the very heart of the Catholic Church,” he said.

They have that there women’s intuition, and they’re so creative with the flowers and the packed lunches and the…the flowers, and the generosity just never quits, they give us all their money and a lot of the time they let us … Read the rest



Archbishop explains why church excludes women *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

Women are just precious and darling, he said, but priests have always been men, and we can’t change that.… Read the rest



With What Authority does a Public Philosopher Speak?

Jul 18th, 2010 | By Andrew Taggart

In the transition from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, we have (so Internet gurus like to suggest) moved from a top-down, “authoritarian” approach to web content to an interactive, user-generated, kaleidoscopic, and, above all, more “democratic” social experiment. As Elie Ofek, a professor of marketing and expert on business innovation, recently put it, consumers “now want to customize content and products to fit their preferences and personality, get immediate feedback on their actions and opinions, and be rewarded for their contributions.” If the bromide that Internet content wants to be free is actually true, then how much more true is it that people in an open society, those committed to a virtual public sphere as well as to each … Read the rest



Jason Rosenhouse asks: where’s the backlash? *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

The New Atheists are said to be bad for evolution acceptance and education, but the numbers show not the slightest evidence of a backlash.… Read the rest



Johann Hari on Polanski and the “lynch mob” *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

It’s ok to drug and rape a 13-year-old girl as long as you’re an artist, we are told.… Read the rest



“The New Atheists” have no evidence *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

“Think of the range of legitimate positions that can be taken on the question of whether earthworms are conscious.”… Read the rest