True to its values
But you don’t. You say you do but you don’t.
A chief constable’s decision to allow uniformed police officers to take part in a Pride march was unlawful, a judge has ruled.
A case was brought against Northumbria Police Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine by Lindsey Smith, from Newcastle, who describes herself as “gender critical”. Ms Smith argued Mrs Jardine and her officers’ participation in Newcastle Pride last year meant they would have been unable to remain impartial if a dispute between those with similar beliefs and trans rights supporters had occurred.
The force said it would work through the ruling to understand the implications but would remain true to its values of “fairness, visibility, and support for all”.
But those are not your values. You don’t promote fairness, visibility, and support for all. You ignore women, and you also promote visibility and support for people who are energetically bullying and replacing and insulting women. You don’t get to say you support fairness for all, because you don’t.
By the way, women are half of people, and all of the gestators of people.
The force said participating in Pride allowed it to be visible in the LGBT community.
It said the chief constable believed the its participation in Pride was one way to demonstrate “the stigma which has traditionally afflicted members of the LGBT+ community will not be reflected” in the community’s interactions with police.
Ok but what about other kinds of people who are afflicted by stigma?
