The female category

The Independent reports:

World Athletics has banned trans women from international competition, Sebastian Coe has confirmed.

That is, World Athletics has banned men from international competition. You’d think it would go without saying. If it’s women’s, it’s not men’s.

The governing body has opted to exclude male-to-female transgender athletes and those with differences in sex development (DSD) from female competition if they have gone through male puberty.

Lord Coe, president of World Athletics, has confirmed the “difficult” decision to change its rules starting on 31 March.

“Difficult” only because of tons of senseless pressure. I actually remember when everyone took it for granted that things for women were for women.

“The decision that the council made is a primarily principled based decision about the over-arching need to protect the female category. This is what our sport is here to do. And I think the council has done that today. We continue to take the view that we must maintain fairness for female athletes above all other considerations.”

What other considerations would there be? People wouldn’t stand around debating whether we should let boxers fight small children; why do they stand around debating whether men should invade women’s athletics?

However, LGBTQI advocacy groups say excluding trans athletes amounts to discrimination.

Not all of them. Certainly not all L advocacy groups – why not ask them? Anyway it’s stupid. We rely on discrimination all the time. If we’re shopping for pears we discriminate between oranges and pears. If we want to read a particular book we discriminate between that book and all the other books. We make choices; we’re allowed to do that. Women get to exclude men when they need to.

5 Responses to “The female category”