An unusual dream
Back in July 2019 the NY Times gave us Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA.
Jeffrey E. Epstein, the wealthy financier who is accused of sex trafficking, had an unusual dream: He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his vast New Mexico ranch.
Mr. Epstein over the years confided to scientists and others about his scheme, according to four people familiar with his thinking, although there is no evidence that it ever came to fruition.
That is unusual! Also revolting.
Mr. Epstein, who was charged in July with the sexual trafficking of girls as young as 14, was a serial illusionist: He lied about the identities of his clients, his wealth, his financial prowess, his personal achievements. But he managed to use connections and charisma to cultivate valuable relationships with business and political leaders.
Interviews with more than a dozen of his acquaintances, as well as public documents, show that he used the same tactics to insinuate himself into an elite scientific community, thus allowing him to pursue his interests in eugenics and other fringe fields like cryonics.
…
Mr. Epstein attracted a glittering array of prominent scientists. They included the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, who discovered the quark; the theoretical physicist and best-selling author Stephen Hawking; the paleontologist and evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould; Oliver Sacks, the neurologist and best-selling author; George M. Church, a molecular engineer who has worked to identify genes that could be altered to create superior humans; and the M.I.T. theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek, a Nobel laureate.
The lure for some of the scientists was Mr. Epstein’s money. He dangled financing for their pet projects. Some of the scientists said that the prospect of financing blinded them to the seriousness of his sexual transgressions, and even led them to give credence to some of Mr. Epstein’s half-baked scientific musings.
…
The Harvard cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker said he was invited by colleagues — including Martin Nowak, a Harvard professor of mathematics and biology, and the theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss — to “salons and coffee klatsches” at which Mr. Epstein would hold court.
While some of Mr. Pinker’s peers hailed Mr. Epstein as brilliant, Mr. Pinker described him as an “intellectual impostor.”
“He would abruptly change the subject, A.D.D.-style, dismiss an observation with an adolescent wisecrack,” Mr. Pinker said.
Good. I like Pinker, so I’m glad he wasn’t suckered.
At one session at Harvard, Mr. Epstein criticized efforts to reduce starvation and provide health care to the poor because doing so increased the risk of overpopulation, said Mr. Pinker, who was there. Mr. Pinker said he had rebutted the argument, citing research showing that high rates of infant mortality simply caused people to have more children. Mr. Epstein seemed annoyed, and a Harvard colleague later told Mr. Pinker that he had been “voted off the island” and was no longer welcome at Mr. Epstein’s gatherings.
Even better.
However impressive his roster of scientific contacts, Mr. Epstein could not resist embellishing it. He claimed on one of his websites to have had “the privilege of sponsoring many prominent scientists,” including Mr. Pinker, Mr. Thorne and the M.I.T. mathematician and geneticist Eric S. Lander.
Mr. Pinker said he had never taken any financial or other support from Mr. Epstein. “Needless to say, I find Epstein’s behavior reprehensible,” he said.
No bromance.

Why are some people, even some otherwise smart ones, taken in by preening narcissists? I don’t get it. I understand being taken in by the clever sort who pretend normalcy, but people like Trump and Tate and Epstein are so obviously full of themselves. I’m not talking about voting for them or taking their money; of course if they’re powerful they might further one’s interests. I’m talking about actually believing they’re cool/smart/admirable people. I don’t get the attraction.
I recall that Elon Musk follows the same strategy of trying to impregnate as many women as possible with his superior genes. Trump also boasts of his superior genes, something that would make a cat laugh if it could recognise the nature of Trump & his spawn.
Good for Pinker – though I’m afraid I’m not all that fond of the man as a thinker: his embrace of Chomskyian linguistics, for one; his silly remarks about music (well countered by Aniruddh Patel, a genuine scientist, in the excellent “Music, Language & the Brain”, as well as, if posthumously and by implication, by Peter Medawar); his attacks on the arts in general, and Virginia Woolf in particular; his blithe optimism that everything is getting better all the time because of scientific & technological advances. I suppose I should add that I am far from being against science and the technology it has allowed, but it is not, and never has been, an unmitigated good – just as no human endeavour of any kind ever has been. “From such crooked timber as humankind is made of nothing entirely straight can be made.”
And, as we can see from this article and other sources, scientists have no necessary claim on the moral high ground. They can be just as venal and unpleasant in their lives as anyone else.
In Genetics, we bred a fruit fly that was bigger, smarter, and faster than the others, but all it did was complain…