Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Women who would otherwise have been housewives

    Oh good grief.

    [David] Willetts blamed the entry of women into the workplace and universities for the lack of progress for men.

    “Feminism trumped egalitarianism,” he said, adding that women who would otherwise have been housewives had taken university places and well-paid jobs that could have gone to ambitious working-class men.

    Yes, and working-class men who would otherwise have been miners had taken university places and well-paid jobs that could have gone to ambitious women. What about it?

    Everybody could always have been and done something else; so what? It’s no more inevitable or Right or How Things Ought to Be that women “are” housewives than it is that working-class men “are” miners. The university places and well-paid jobs don’t somehow belong to men, and women aren’t stealing them if they try to get them too.

    Women who would otherwise have been housewives would have been housewives because things were rigged against them. That’s what that “otherwise” is pointing at. Willetts is thinking back to a time when it was just taken for granted that women would “be” housewives and that they would not “be” anything else, especially not anything demanding brains and hard work, and he’s thinking of it as if it were a natural or default state which we have now weirdly departed from, with the result that women are grabbing jobs that should have gone to men.

    It looks to me as if David Willetts grabbed a job that should have gone to someone who doesn’t think that way.

  • David Willetts says women took men’s jobs

    Women who would otherwise have been housewives had taken university places and well-paid jobs that could have gone to ambitious working-class men.

  • Friday Friday

    Watch out for Fridays. Maybe stay home on Fridays, with the doors locked and barred and sheets of iron over the windows. At least, if you live somewhere like Pakistan or Afghanistan, do that.

    Thousands of demonstrators angered over the burning of a Koran in Florida mobbed offices of the United Nations in northern Afghanistan on Friday, overrunning the compound and killing at least seven foreign staff workers, according to Afghan officials…The incident began when thousands of protesters poured out of the Blue Mosque in Mazar-i-Sharif after Friday prayers and attacked the nearby headquarters of the United Nations.

    Correlation is not causation, but when thousands of angry men rush out of a mosque after Friday prayers and attack a nearby UN headquarters, causation seems a pretty safe bet.

    The crowd, which he estimated at 20,000, overwhelmed police forces and the United Nations security guards, and the weapons they used in the attack may have been those they seized from the United Nations guards.

    Funny kind of “prayers,” too, if the correlation is indeed causation. Funny kind of “prayers” that can prompt twenty thousand men (yes men – they don’t let women join in) to go on a violent rampage and kill some random innocent people.

    Mr. Ahmadzai, the police spokesman, said the demonstrators were angry about the burning of the Koran at the church of Pastor Terry Jones on Mar. 20.

    Except it’s not actually “the” Koran that was burnt. Jones didn’t cause the Koran to disappear from the face of the earth. It was one copy out of many millions. It was a calculated insult, and that is all. It was not a felony, much less a capital crime, and a mob in Afghanistan is not an appropriate substitute for a Florida cop in any case.

    Shut up your doors on Fridays.

  • Stanley Fish gets something not wrong

    He is bothered by “the spectacle of a court declaring with a straight face that the state-mandated display of crucifixes has nothing to do with religion or indoctrination.”

  • Another problem solved

    What a relief: it turns out that religious schools don’t exclude after all. Whew!

    The Catholic school accommodates plenty of non-Catholic children whose parents are often African Christians who choose to send their kids to a school with a specifically religious ethos.

    In other words, they find a denominational school, even if it is not of their own denomination, more congenial than a non-denominational or a multi-denominational school.

    This is an absolutely key point. It blows out of the water the assumption that denominational schools somehow ‘exclude’ anyone not of their own denomination.

    Ohhhhhh, I see. I was confused all this time. I thought “exclusion” could apply to students of other religions as well as other denominations, and to students of no religion at all at all. But it turns out that’s wrong and the only issue is that a school of one denomination might exclude students of a different denomination and David Quinn knows of one where it doesn’t work that way, he guesses, as far as he knows, so there’s no problem with churchy schools and everything is copacetic.

    A cynic might say oh really? So a Catholic school doesn’t exclude children from Muslim backgrounds? Or Protestant ones? Or secular or atheist ones? But decent people don’t care what a cynic might say, so let’s rejoice to know that denominational schools are a wonderful brilliant great terrific perfect idea.

  • George Johnson on Laurence Krauss’s Feynman bio

    In “Quantum Man” we see a master mathematician who could concentrate on a problem for hours and then recast it in a surprising new manner.

  • Afghanistan: 10 UN workers killed by mob

    The incident began when thousands of protesters poured out of the Blue Mosque in Mazar-i-Sharif after Friday prayers…

  • To say religious schools exclude is nonsense

    Because they exclude only the non-religious, and who cares about that?

  • Nick Cohen notes: they missed the story

    The Arab uprising is annihilating the assumptions of foreign ministries, academia and human rights groups with true revolutionary élan.

  • The Godly are always there in the wings

    Howard Jacobson is cautious about revolutionary elation.

    Let’s not get too carried away by the secular nature of the revolutionary zeal engulfing the Middle East right now: the Godly are always there in the wings, waiting for the hour in which they can claim the victory as theirs and restore tyranny, only in their image. Maybe it won’t happen this time – I doubt it, listening to protesters saying they don’t mind what comes next, so long as the process is democratic, as though a democratically elected theocracy is somehow better than any other kind.

    Really. I do wish people would get that straight.

    Much has been made over the last weeks of the youthful passion of the demonstrators, tweeting for liberty. Here, two of the most terrible illusions of our time are yoked together. To the fallacy that the opinions of the young are worth attending to because they are not the opinions of the old is joined the fallacy that the the internet, because it is ungovernable, is bound to be a positive instrument for good.

     Or to put it another way, theocrats also know how to tweet.

  • Gingrich predicts an atheist US dominated by Islamists

    He said so at Pastor John Hagee’s Texas megachurch. Srsly.

  • Howard Jacobson on the revolutions

    The Godly are always there in the wings, waiting for the hour in which they can claim the victory as theirs and restore tyranny, only in their image.

  • Howard Jacobson at Index on Censorship

    “It’s not just writers who are the enemy now; it’s language itself.”

  • Louis Theroux revisits Westboro Baptist church

    The family regard it as their duty to “rejoice in all of God’s judgements” – murders, natural disasters, the loss of loved-ones to carnality and fornication.

  • Spain investigates the stolen babies problem

    Franco set the precedent, and then it became a racket.

  • Whither higher education?

    And what is it, anyway? An expensive but meaningless credential, a ticket to debt, vocational training, or education?

  • British mum finds Allah in her potato

    See? Those brown lines where it’s starting to rot? That’s Allah.

  • Mona Eltahawy on Eman Al Obeidi

    And revolutionary women in Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia…

  • Susan Jacoby on that absurd heaven book

    What is truly disturbing about this book’s huge commercial success is that it attests to the prevalence of unreason among vast numbers of Americans.

  • The uses of leisure

    As Lauryn Oates points out, it’s good that Afghanistan is so happy and prosperous that its President can afford to pay attention to the elegant details of life.

    The deputy governor of Helmand province has been sacked for organising a concert that featured female performers without headscarves.

    Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai took the action against Abdul Satar Mirzakwal after tribal elders complained that it was inappropriate.

    Karzai himself was sufficiently at leisure to fire a deputy governor for allowing two women to sing at a concert without bags over their heads.

    And while we’re on the subject, notice the typical craven way the BBC puts it – “without headscarves.” Notice what an official says a few paragraphs down –

    “Women do not appear in public without wearing a burka and niqab in an Islamic country like Afghanistan,” one official, who wished to remain unnamed, said.

    Burka and niqab is not the same as a headscarf! Burka and niqab is a full-body fabric sack with a thick lattice in front of the eyes. A scarf covers the hair; hijab covers the hair and neck; burka and niqab covers everything. Let’s not be euphemistic.