‘Maybe not liberal democracy, but uncommon democracy; based on religious values.’
Author: Ophelia Benson
-
Time for the Caliphate to Reign
‘Why do some Muslims not agree with the Islamic Sharia, even though it is for the own good of Muslims?’
-
Skeptics Whup God in Bestseller Competition
Dawkins and Hitchens currently outselling pope. It’s a start.
-
The Observer’s Astrologer Grumbles at Dawkins
‘Few things arouse the indignation of science’s hard hats like non-conventional approaches to healing.’
-
Our World View Was Still Horriby Bipolar
‘We didn’t distinguish on the basis of colour, but on creed. The world was simply divided into believers and nonbelievers.’
-
Dreams of a caliphate
Why would a caliphate be such a nice thing?
Hizb ut-Tahrir regards this as the ideal form of government, because it follows what it believes are the laws of God as set out in the Koran, rather than laws designed by [humans].
Right. And that’s why we don’t regard a caliphate as the ideal form of government but rather as the ulitmate nightmare. It’s because the ‘laws of God’ are beyond appeal and rational analysis and reform in the light of new knowledge or improved morality, whereas laws designed by humans are not. In practice, of course, the ‘laws of God’ are sometimes revised or reformed, but in principle they can always be and often are declared inviolable as ‘God’ is inviolable. That’s what makes them so damn terrifying. They are, in principle, beyond rational debate. That’s not safe.
-
Because they know it teases
I immediately begin trying out Dawkins’ appeal in polite company. At dinner parties or over drinks, I ask people to declare themselves. “Who here is an atheist?” I ask. Usually, the first response is silence, accompanied by glances all around in the hope that somebody else will speak first. Then, after a moment, somebody does, almost always a man, almost always with a defiant smile and a tone of enthusiasm. He says happily, “I am!” But it is the next comment that is telling. Somebody turns to him and says: “You would be.”
“Why?”
“Because you enjoy pissing people off.”
“Well, that’s true.”
It’s clear enough what we’re supposed to get from all that. One, it’s almost always a man who pipes up because men are pugnacious and competitive and obnoxious, whereas women are more tactful and co-operative and sweet and kind. Two, atheists are atheists because they enjoy pissing people off. Three, atheism of course pisses people off. Well, fuck that. I’m a woman, and I am not more tactful and co-operative and sweet and kind, as anyone who knows me will knock over chairs and hatstands in the rush to confirm. More to the point, I’m a woman and I hate like hell the idea that women are too nice to be atheist or rational or skeptical or anything else in that department of the store.
But more significant (and silly) is the assumption that atheism naturally and automatically pisses people off. That’s a very parochial assumption. Atheism does piss off a lot of people in the US, but the US isn’t the world, and in some places atheism is more boring and taken for granted than irritating. The existence of this unexamined assumption is one reason the ‘new Atheists’ are right that atheists need to speak up more.
-
Police File Case Against Taslima Nasreen
‘Her writings have always provoked the religious-minded so we have registered a case for provocative literature.’
-
Taslima Nasrin ‘Promoting Communal Enmity’
Hyderabad police have registered a case against her for allegedly ‘creating ill-feeling among communities.’
-
‘We’ll Behead Taslima Next Time’
Threats violate Sections 503, 506, 350, 351, 352, 355, 120B, 153A.
-
Oxford Warns Wycliffe College
Complaints of homophobia and misogyny have been levelled at Wycliffe’s leadership.
-
NHS Cuts Funding of Homeopathy
The bold idea is that scarce money ought to be spent on treatments that work.
-
November Conference at Center for Inquiry NYC
The Secular Society & Its Enemies: speakers include Hitchens, Singer, Kaminer, Tyson, Druyan.
-
OUP Interviews Julian Baggini
OUP: If there is no God, why bother being good? Baggini: If there is a God, why bother being good?
-
The Attack on Taslima Nasreen
Rationalist International expresses shock and deep concern about the attack on Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen today (August 9) by the radical political outfit Majlis Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (MIM) at the Hyderabad Press Club. She was releasing the Telegu translation of her book “Shodd”. Taslima Nasreen is an Honorary Associate of Rationalist International.
MIM activists, led by three state Legislative Council members (MLAs), raised slogans against Taslima and flung bouquets and chairs at her and others attending the function. However, no injuries have been reported so far.
MIM leader Akhtar Khan, an MLA, said: “She is enemy of Islam, she is a black spot on Muslims.. We cannot bear anyone talking against Islam. She has written books against Islam. We will not tolerate her in Hyderabad.”
Taslima was rescued by the police and journalists present at the press club and was escorted to the air port. Three radicals have been detained by the police for questioning.
Taslima is living in exile for the last twelve years after death threats forced her to flee Bangladesh. She is an outspoken champion of equal rights for women and a fearless fighter against religion.
Taslima has faced numerous death threats from Islamic radicals. Recently, in March 2007, an Indian Muslim group offered a bounty of 500,000 rupees for her beheading.
-
CDWRME Bulletin for July-August
Women in Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Israel.
-
Muslim ‘Protesters’ Attack Taslima Nasreen
About 100 protesters burst in, shouting that the author was ‘anti-Islam’.
-
Muslim Lawmakers Attack Nasreen
She backed into a corner as men threw heavy objects at her head and threatened her with a chair.
-
Gay Nigerians Face Death Penalty
Eighteen men have been remanded in prison after arrest for alleged sodomy in northern Nigeria.
-
Dawkins Right on Alt Med, Wrong on Religion
Religion is about ethics, does not compete with science. Oh really?
