Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Split Decision in Michigan Case

    Michigan’s law school can continue to consider race; undergraduate programme is unconstitutional.

  • Mixed Decision in US Affirmative Action Case

    The US Supreme Court narrowly upholds University of Michigan’s use of race in admissions, rejects point system.

  • Words Do Matter

    Under God, one man one vote, Muslim child – language does shape our consciousness.

  • Creationism Gaining Ground in the US

    The Dini case, a conspicuous ‘debate’ in Tucson, a new ‘Special Counsel for Religious Discrimination’ in Ashcroft’s Justice Department.

  • Whiteness Studies

    Race is a fiction, therefore everyone must learn to be completely obsessed by it. Eh?

  • Say Anything and Say It Murkily

    A mash note to Alan Sokal in the Guardian.

  • A Recipe not a Blueprint

    Matt Ridley on the way genes and experience interact.

  • Bristol Reaffirms Admissions Policy

    Bristol University will continue to consider backgrounds as well as academic records.

  • Who Took What When?

    The reporter who investigated what happened at the Baghdad Museum says the waters are still being muddied.

  • A Debate on ‘Diversity’ in the Arts

    Whether the arts should be judged on aesthetic grounds, or on ethnic representation.

  • How We Do Love Female Victims

    Virginia Woolf told jokes, including obscene ones, Doris Lessing points out.

  • Virginia Woolf Being Unpleasant

    Woolf’s early notebook reveals – surprise! – she had her flaws.

  • Atwood on Orwell

    How quickly rebels can move to the other side.

  • A Psychologist’s Choice

    Authoritarian cults that demand sensitivity or else, or hard-headed researchers who ask questions.

  • Not New but Timely

    An interview with Bernard Williams in the Guardian last November.

  • A Rich and Moving Elegy

    Richard Wollheim on Bernard Williams in The Independent.

  • Grayling on Williams

    A.C. Grayling on Bernard Williams in The Financial Times.

  • The Arts and Cultural Diversity

    Immigrant, ethnic minority, asylum-seeker – slivers of insinuation separate
    the meanings of each term in contemporary Britain. Ethnic minority, black and
    Asian, cultural diversity – clouds of obfuscation have distinguished contemporary
    arts in Britain over the past 30 years.

    That I draw an analogy between socio-political and artistic terminology is
    not incidental: socio-political concerns have determined arts-funding policy
    for the past three decades. Ever since, in fact, the publication of Naseem Khan’s
    seminal report for the Arts Council in 1976, ‘The Arts Britain Ignores’. This
    year sees the launch of yet another arts initiative, designed to heap attention
    on ‘culturally diverse’ arts, aptly titled ‘decibel’ (noise). Why do we need
    a showcase of ethnic arts? And what noise is decibel really making?

    In the same year Naseem Khan’s report was published, the writer Amrit Wilson
    published her compilation of Asian women’s stories – Finding A Voice.
    It seems we ethnics are still deemed to be in need of finding a public voice.
    Hence the decibel showcase, where Arts Council England aims to draw the
    attention of producers nationally and internationally to work they have hitherto
    ignored. This despite ‘ethnic’ artists of the first rank making noises in almost
    every category of contemporary arts, from Anish Kapoor to Ben Okri, Akram Khan
    to Chewitel Ejiofor, Shobana Jeyasingh to Zadie Smith.

    ‘Access’ and ‘opportunity’ are the current buzzwords, their roots lying in the
    best of British liberal sentiments. It is laudable for any society that considers
    itself civilised to seek to promote an equality of opportunity for all its citizens.
    But when the wheel is having to be reinvented every 10 years or so, it is time
    to question the wheel.

    In 1976, it was Naseem Khan’s report that drew attention to the arts Britain
    ignored. In 1983, the Arts Council sought, through its ‘Glory of the Garden’
    policy, to enforce a minimum representation of ethnic arts in the arts-infrastructure
    of the country. In the mid-1990s, the Arts Council adopted the promotion of
    cultural diversity as a central part of its mission statement. In 2002, the
    Arts Council’s Eclipse Report aimed to change the institutionally racist
    face of British theatre.

    Significantly, every liberal political measure undertaken so far to correct
    injustices – the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry into institutional racism being only
    the most recent – has proven ineffectual. Racism is not an intellectual failure
    that can be corrected by a greater dose of education. It is a moral value, however
    much one may abhor such a morality. It is an imaginative construct and so the
    engineers of the imagination – artists – find themselves in the frontline, their
    weapons being the pen or the hand or the body or the voice.

    But when these troops are divided by ethnicity, it makes the prospect of victory
    ever dimmer. Just as we forget that Black Africans, Caribbeans and Americans,
    Indians, Chinese, Afghans and other ‘ethnics’ fought alongside the Allies in
    two world wars, so by institutionalising ethnic divisions we are prone to forget
    that in contemporary British arts there is an ever-present ‘ethnicity’ – and
    forgetting is tantamount to devaluing.

    What, if any, is the artistic significance of Bombay Dreams as a West
    End musical? Is its ability to attract an Asian audience into the West End an
    artistic value? Is, conversely, Jerry Springer – The Opera anything
    more than a ‘pakora’ musical: say ‘cunt’ and ‘fuck’ enough times and you’re
    guaranteed to draw in a youthful audience in droves (mirroring what goes on
    in the Asian comedy scene, where the mention of ‘pakora’ is a sure-fire route
    to cracking-up the audience).

    A national theatre critic once admitted to me that he came to review our shows
    not because of the particular play we were producing but because it was ethnic
    and needed to be brought to wider attention. That was in 1989. Has much changed
    since then? And will showcasing culturally diverse work – as the decibel
    initiative purports to do – help that critic to drop his ethnic lens? I very
    much doubt it.

    Of equal concern, however, is how the critic judges: how to evaluate ‘other’
    arts. And this is a real challenge. How does one judge, for example, the ‘fusion’
    dance of Akram Khan, drawing as much on classical Kathak as it does on contemporary
    dance vocabularies? This I take to be the artistic value of ‘cultural diversity’
    – challenging our preconceptions, our imaginations.

    But when a corral is created around cultural diversity we are being fed, and
    we help sustain, difference; rather than be confronted to explore connections.
    Merely beating the drum of culturally diverse arts – as decibel seeks
    to do – will only help to marginalise these artists within the confines of ‘identity’.
    Identity need not be immutable; it can be in dialogue with other identities.
    It is only then that we can all participate in the quality of the artistic experience.

    The contradictions in arts policies were brought home to me at the recent Asian
    Women’s Achievement Awards. The title, of course, is very ghetto. But Cherie
    Blair and other leading New Labour women were there to endorse it – as an instance
    of the multicultural reality of Britain today. Surely a multicultural, integrated
    society would honour women’s achievements, or even just achievements. So are
    we in reality talking multi-culture or separate-cultures?

    We in the arts world have become so dominated by marketing gurus – and their
    dogma of ‘niche marketing’ – that we forget that if I don’t see you in me and
    if you can’t see me in you we might as well dispense with the abiding hope of
    the arts: to connect one human being with another. This fetishisation of marketing
    makes the good ship Arts scythe through the waves of humanism and, like Moses,
    we stand before a divided sea.

    Jatinder Verma is artistic director of Tara Arts, a theatre company he co-founded
    in 1977. Tara Arts is a regular client of Arts Council England, has toured extensively
    in Britain and overseas, and co-produced with theatres including the Royal National
    Theatre and the Lyric Theatre, Hammersmith. Tara Arts’ latest show, A Taste
    For Mangoes, about the Indo-British love affair before the Raj, will open in
    London’s oldest music hall, Wilton’s, in November 2003.

  • Daniel Dennett Interview

    The spectre of creeping exculpation, the discomfort of discontinuity, and more.

  • Who Would Mate With Rational Economic Man?

    Is Feminist Economics less silly than it sounds?