Member of the Council of Religious Scholars
said mixing male and female students was a great sin.
Author: Ophelia Benson
-
Saudi King Boots Powerful Cleric
-
Shirin Ebadi: Iran’s Women Are Not Afraid
Women are well aware that they will obtain equality only within a truly democratic political order.
-
The Demographics of Atheism
Nick Spencer of ‘Theos’ says that as atheism goes down-market it becomes more like religion.
-
Catholic Missionary Priest Defends Condom Policy
Wear a tooth-guard before reading.
-
Why Do Nonbelievers Baptise Their Children?
Because they don’t believe in limbo, yet it still worries them. ‘Why take the risk? It made me uneasy.’
-
Found objects and bus-flattened treasures
Lookit! A blog post all about my friend Claire and how universe-boggling she is and what remarkable art jewelry she makes when she is not busy teaching or doing research or writing a book or picking up squashed bottle caps off the ground. There are pictures of some of the art jewelry that you can look at. I have a sensational piece of art jewelry that Claire made me for my birthday. I made all the readers of that blog post jealous by describing it. It is thrillingly complicated as well as beautiful.
-
No you may not learn about ethics, you little heathen
Apparently church groups in Australia think that if you’re not doing something churchy then you shouldn’t be doing anything at all.
At the moment, an archaic clause in NSW’s Education Act prohibits students who opt out of scripture from being taught anything while others receive religious instruction. At some schools, that means more than half the students are basically doing nothing…The NSW Federation of Parents and Citizens Association (P&C) has funded the St James Centre for Ethics to develop a pilot program to teach ethics to students who don’t want to learn scripture. But the program had barely crossed the Education Minister’s desk before the Government’s religious education advisory panel sounded the alarm. Approving the proposal would require the Parliament to kill that archaic clause, and the churches clearly fear this may be the crest of a very slippery slope.
A……slope to where, exactly? What is the slope that leads from an ethics class to…perdition? A tank full of broken glass? Life as a banker who moonlights as a prostitute?
The current arrangement goes back over a century to when the State took over public education from the Catholic Church. The public of that time was more worried that the State, not the Church, had too much control over education.
Oh, so that’s it. They used to have a monopoly, and when the monopoly was taken away, they were still allowed to keep a little piece of it. They want to go on keeping it, so they don’t want any competion for their ‘scripture’ classes. Yet another example of the instinctive generosity of the religious.
-
Meet the ‘Quiverfull’ Families
No, on second thought, don’t.
-
Court Reviewing Berlusconi’s Immunity Law
Berlusconi says immunity allows him to govern without being ‘distracted’ by the judiciary.
-
How to Make a Turin Shroud
First, heat your oven to 450 degrees; next, place a linen sheet over a volunteer and rub it with a pigment.
-
Church Loses Fight to Keep its Records Sealed
Mumbles something about its First Amendment rights.
-
The Dumbest Education Policy In Australia?
Students who don’t want to study scripture must not be allowed to study anything else instead!
-
Italian Scientists: Turin Shroud is Medieval Fake
Scientists couldn’t explain how the image was left on the cloth; now the trick has been duplicated.
-
Child Witchcraft and Child Rights in Akwa Ibom State
Child witchcraft stands for the claim that children can be witches and wizards or that infants can or do engage in witchcraft activities like turning themselves into birds or insects – at night – to suck blood or mysteriously inflict harm on someone. It is the belief that children have evil powers which they use or can use to destory people particularly their family or community members. As I have pointed out here, child witchcraft is a claim, a belief – a superstitious belief. Child witchcraft is manifested in different forms: accusation, confession and persecution.
Children are accused of being witches and wizards. Somtimes children who talk in their dreams or sleep walk are said to be witches. They are blamed for whatever goes wrong in their families. And this could be death, diseases, business failure, accidents, childbirth difficulties, etc. Children are accused of witchcraft at home by their parents and family members, at churches by ignorant and unscrupulous pastors, at schools by friends and colleagues, at the shrines by primitive minded traditional medicine men or witch doctors, and on the streets by mobs and gangs. Children are forced to confess to being witches and wizards or to have indulged in witchcraft activities by family members or by mobs, in most cases after physical and mental torture. Children alleged to be witches and wizards are subjected to torture, and inhuman and degrading treatment which sometimes lead to their death. Such children are starved, chained, beaten, matcheted or lynched. At the churches, pastors subject children alleged to be witches and wizards to torture in the name of exorcism. Witchdoctors force such children to drink potions (poison) or concoctions which often kill them or damage their health. In Akwa Ibom State, the phenomenon of child witchcraft is common and widespread. Most people in the state, as in other parts of the country, subscribe to the superstitious idea that children can indeed be witches and wizards or that children can engage in witchcraft activities.
This misconception has caused most people to endorse at least tacitly the witch persecution of children, or to remain indifferent to child rights abuses that are committed in the name of witchcraft. It has caused most members of the public to regard witchcraft accusers, witch persecutors and killers as heroes, not villains or criminals. Recently, the situation in Akwa Ibom has been really bad to the point that it has attracted both local and international outrage. Thousands of children alleged to be witches and wizards were tortured, driven out of their homes or killed. Some of the child victims rescued by some public spirited individuals are kept at a camp, the Child Rights and Rehabiltation Network, in Eket. Many of them bear the scars of their traumatic experience. And it was in response to this very ugly and embarrassing situation that the government of Akwa Ibom State signed into law the child rights act in December, 2008. According to Governor Godswill Akpabio, the child rights act was signed into law “to protect children and posterity.” According to him it would be “futile to make the gains we have made in terms of development and progress without preparing the next generation for sustaining our legacy.”
The child rights law protects the growth of perceptual, emotional, intellectual and behavoural capabilities and functioning during childhood of Akwa Ibom children under 16 years. It empowers them with the capacity to enjoy physical, social and psychological well-being through the enforcement of their physical, mental and emotional freedom from abuse.
The implementation of the Child Rights Act would create a conducive atmosphere for the development of the child.
It would bring to an end child abuse by criminalizing and penalising abusers. The law guarantees comprehensive government protection for Akwa Ibom State children
It strengthens the mechanisms for the defence and protection of children.
Specifically, the law prescribes up to 15 years imprisonment without an option of a fine or both for offenders in child stigmatisation, accusation of witchcraft or torture. It empowers the government to seal off the premises of any organization used to prepetrate child abuse. It is obvious that when it comes to stamping out a complex phenomenon like child witchcraft, the government cannot do it alone. The government needs the cooperation of the people and all the citizens of Akwa Ibom to succeed in fully implementing the Child Rights Act.
The government needs the people’s help in identifying and prosecuting offenders. Child rights abuses in the name of witchcraft have been going on for some time because offenders have not been prosecuted or punished. People need to report to the police all those who stigmatize or label children witches and wizards whether they are our parents or family members, pastors or traditional medicinemen. We need to inform the police of any witch testing, witch screening and witchcraft delivering churches, centers or “clinics” anywhere in the state.
The prosecution of some pastors arrested in connection with child witch stigmatization and persecution in the state is currently stalled because people are not coming forward to testify against them. The child rights law cannot be fully enforced if people are afraid of reporting or testifying against parents, family members, pastors or witch doctors or anyone alleged to have labelled children witches or wizards. Lastly, I want to commend the government of Akwa Ibom for adopting this important legislation and urge all the people of Akwa Ibom should rise up to the challenge of helping the government implement it. The implementation of the child rights act is critical to the eradication of child witchcraft and to the protection of the rights of the child in Akwa Ibom State.
-
Who, me?
In which we learn that Dawkins does not actually have fangs and a dripping cleaver.
To most observers, Dawkins is the textbook aggressive champion of evolutionary theory…In person, Dawkins fails to live up to the “aggressive” label…So he is genuinely puzzled by people calling him aggressive. “Well, I’m nothing like as aggressive as I’m portrayed. And I’m always being labelled ‘strident’. In the bestseller lists it always has a little one-line summary of the book, and for my new one it says ‘strident academic Richard Dawkins’. I’m forever saddled with this wretched adjective. I think I’m one of the most unstrident people in the world.”
Well don’t I know the feeling – though of course on a much smaller scale. I’m spared the thing about the bestseller list for example.
But in my tiny way, don’t I know the feeling. I’ve been called strident – I’ve even been called aggressive, though not all that often. I wouldn’t go as far as Dawkins…I wouldn’t say I think I’m one of the most unstrident people in the world, or one of the most unaggressive, either. I’m not that delusional. I am often verbally aggressive, often deliberately so. I am sometimes tooverbally aggressive – I’m apt to get irritable and impatient. (As does Dawkins – and if doesn’t know this about himself, that’s a little odd. I think his reputation for ferocity is wildly and unfairly exaggerated, for political reasons, but if he thinks he’s never waspish or hasty or sharp – he’s not thinking hard enough.)
But there is a difference (and a difference that matters – quite a lot, as a matter of fact) between being sometimes waspish or irritable or impatient or disputatious, and being aggressive or militant or mean or a bully. This has been part of the issue with Mooney and Kirshenbaum ever since last May – their willingness, not to say eagerness, to use hostile rhetoric to describe people who disagree with them. I don’t think people should do that. I think it’s unfair. I would even say it has a whiff of the bully about it.
-
Jesus and Mo Celebrate Blasphemy Day
Atheists squirm in agony.
-
Ahmadinejad is…shh…Jewish!
Experts suggested his track record for hate-filled attacks on Jews could be a ploy to hide his past.
-
‘Compassionate’ Bishop Charged in Child Porn
‘Until women find a little bit more of their place in the church, and until we get rid of the men’s club, we’re in trouble.’
-
Dawkins Believes People Can Change Their Minds
There are lots of people who think they are creationists who are just beginning to question what they were taught.
-
Dawkins Does a McLuhan
Jerry Coyne took a few minutes from all the fun he was having at the Boys’ Atheists jamboree to do a quick post on Dawkins and accommodationism.
An alert reader called my attention to two blog posts by Josh Rosenau and Chris Mooney/Sheril Kirshenbaum, both claiming that Richard Dawkins explicitly voiced accommodationist views in a Newsweek interview. “He’s changed!” they say.
Has not, Jerry says.
Well, I know Richard Dawkins. I am at a meeting with Richard Dawkins. I just discussed these accusations of accommodationism with Richard Dawkins. And I can tell you, Chris, Sheril, and Josh, that Richard is not one of you.
And, satisfyingly, he includes Richard’s written confirmation that he is no accommodationist:
How utterly ridiculous. All I was saying is that it is possible for a human mind to accommodate both evolution and religion because F. Collins’s mind seems to manage the feat (along with lots of vicars and bishops and rabbis).
Then Jerry expresses a hope which seems unlikely to be fulfilled…
Now that Dawkins has verified this, it would be nice to see Rosenau, Mooney, and Kirshenbaum correct their postings. And they need to stop pretending that the existence of religious scientists and religious people who accept evolution proves that science and faith are compatible. We settled that issue long ago. The issue is philosophical compatibility.
As I pointed out in the comments, Mooney did once grasp this point, though without admitting he had grasped anything new, or changed his thinking, or learned anything from his critics, much less apologizing for maligning them for weeks on end. I pointed out this oversight at the time, but fat lot of good it did me. Anyway he lost his grip on the point again, and now he’s just back at the same old stand.
