There is no way of being tough and effective without being fair, and no way of being fair without tough choices.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Leeds Destitution Inquiry Presents its Findings
Mar 30th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonCalls for a policy in which asylum seekers can contribute to society rather than rely on precarious handouts.… Read the rest
Bad-tempered pope
Mar 29th, 2007 12:57 pm | By Ophelia BensonWhat’s the pope furious about?
[The pope] has reiterated the existence of Hell and condemned society for not talking about eternal damnation enough. A furious Pope Benedict unleashed a bitter attack during a sermon while on a visit to a parish church and said: “Hell exists and there is eternal punishment for those who sin and do not repent. The problem today is society does not talk about Hell. It’s as if it did not exist, but it does.”
He’s furious because today society does not talk about Hell? That makes him furious? Really? Well what a horrible sadistic cruel wicked little man then. (Little morally, mentally, ethically, cognitively. I don’t know whether he’s little physically or not, and … Read the rest
Updike Reviews Isaacson on Einstein
Mar 29th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSpecial relativity has a flavor of the patent office.… Read the rest
Steven Pinker on the History of Violence
Mar 29th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRomantic theory gets it backward: modernity has made us less violent, not more so.… Read the rest
People Don’t Talk About Hell Enough Any More
Mar 29th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonGood to have a pope who doesn’t mess around with no hell and no devil and human rights.… Read the rest
Nick Cohen Talks to Julian Baggini
Mar 29th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPhilosophical training to be as critical of the biases he and friends shared as of the biases of others.… Read the rest
Pope Promises Eternal Punishment
Mar 29th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘The problem today is society does not talk about Hell. It’s as if it did not exist, but it does.’… Read the rest
Truth Still Matters
Mar 29th, 2007 | By Jeremy Stangroom and Ophelia BensonThis article started life as a post by JS on Talking Philosophy, The Philosophers’ Magazine’s new blog. The post criticised the shortcomings of an opinion poll commissioned by the British Humanist Association. David Pollock and Jemima Hooper of the BHA later commented on the post, and Casper Melville posted a comment on the New Humanist blog, to which Julian Baggini replied. JS and OB then wrote separate comments on the BHA reaction – a reaction which gave them an odd feeling that they would have to write Why Truth Matters all over again, or at least give the BHA a tutorial in its subject matter.
The Opinion Poll
The recent opinion poll commissioned by The British Humanist Association (BHA) … Read the rest
Oh who cares about truth
Mar 28th, 2007 12:16 pm | By Ophelia BensonOkay so people like rationalists and humanists and similar are supposed to value reason and truth and accuracy and getting things right, right? Or am I confused.
I ask because of some comments on Jeremy’s post on The British Humanist Association’s opinion poll. They make me wonder.
… Read the restSo, less of this ivory tower disdain, please, for the honest labours of those who are trying to defend the secular principle in the face of sustained attack by the most religious government for over 100 years…In the real world of politics you cannot always be academically nice – your opponents will make mincemeat of you if you try…On rationality and truth – come down out of your ivory tower! The BHA
Pascal Bruckner Replies to Buruma, Garton Ash
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPreferring modern fundamentalism to terrorism runs the risk of having both.… Read the rest
Interview with Bernard-Henri Lévy
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWe reject the horrors of our past: That should be enough. That’s an identity. … Read the rest
Raymond Bradley: The Rivalry Between Religions
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRight at the outset, one is faced with a huge number of possible candidates for belief.… Read the rest
Child Abuse Hidden for Fear of ‘Dishonour’
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMost people surveyed said they felt the authorities did not understand their religion and culture.… Read the rest
Fundamentalists Play Moral Cops, Executioners
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonGroup of men accuse woman of affair, then stab her to death.… Read the rest
Police to Receive ‘Faith Education’
Mar 28th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘As part of plans to improve the handling of religiously aggravated crimes.’ Improve how?… Read the rest
Some items loosely strung together
Mar 27th, 2007 5:44 pm | By Ophelia BensonA new(ish) blog by a philosophy type: Delight Springs.
David Thompson points out that we’re allowed to dislike any religion. Yes, even that one.
Oliver Kamm also comments on Charlie Hebdo and free speech: “Those who claim that the state of their religious sensibilities is a justification for punishing speech have been rightly rebuffed.”
Stephen Law has an amusing post on pseudo-profundity (gee, what do you suppose put that idea in his head?).
… Read the restIf all your jargon is defined using other jargon, no one will ever be able to figure out exactly what you mean (though your devotees may think they know). And the fact that buried within your pseudo-profundities are one or true truisms will give
Making the case in terms anyone can agree with
Mar 27th, 2007 2:20 pm | By Ophelia BensonA comment on this post snagged my attention.
It depends on the context. But let’s stick to the political for now. In that arena, you make progress by gathering allies, not making enemies – although you will always have to make some of them. So you make the case in terms that anyone can agree with, even if they’re not atheists. I was involved in a pamphlet advocating restrictions on religious schools, and that’s just what we did. We didn’t premise the case on religion’s falsity, but issues of social cohesion, autonomy and so on.
Well, it depends. Even in politics you don’t always make the case in terms that anyone can agree with, because it depends on what the … Read the rest
Sounds Like a Fun Evening
Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDawkins, Grayling, Hitchens against religion; Neuberger, Scruton, Spivey for.… Read the rest
Grayling on Why Atheists Resist
Mar 27th, 2007 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAs knowledge replaced animism, deities became invisible, receding to mountain tops and then to the sky. … Read the rest