Foreign Office on Forced Marriage Unit *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Forced marriage is not a religious or cultural issue – it is a global human rights abuse.’… Read the rest



UK Drive to Reduce Forced Marriages *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Forced marriage is a form of domestic violence and a human rights abuse.’… Read the rest



Julian Baggini on Treating Nations as Responsible *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

What is not ultimately fair or philosophically defensible is sometimes nevertheless indispensable. … Read the rest



John Sutherland Talks to Julia Kristeva *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

Claims she has ‘patented’ three ideas.… Read the rest



Anti-abortion Group Posts People’s Addresses *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

Call people ‘baby murderers’ then provide their addresses. Nice.… Read the rest



Letters on Wiesltier’s Review of Dennett *

Mar 16th, 2006 | Filed by

Everyone thinks it’s stupid and bad and awful. Very pleasing.… Read the rest



Take That, Leon

Mar 16th, 2006 1:58 am | By

Now this is satisfying. A lot of people telling the infuriating smug NY Times what a crap review that review by Wieseltier was. It would be all the more satisfying to see Wieseltier admit as much and express remorse and embarrassment at the horrible juvenile abusive spittle-flecked tone of it – but this is satisfying all the same.

Sam Harris:

Wieseltier writes with triumphal smugness about the “excesses of naturalism” that apparently blight Dennett’s work. He might as well have pointed out the “excesses of historical accuracy” or the “excesses of logical coherence.” If utter naturalism is a sin, it is one only from the point of view of religious faith — a faith that has grown ever more

Read the rest


Out of Order

Mar 15th, 2006 10:42 pm | By

Not a good day. A frustrating day, a malfunctioning day, an irritating day. Email problems – or perhaps correspondent problems. It can be so hard to tell. When someone ignores several emails, you may decide ‘well, I guess I can take a hint (however belatedly)’ and stop emailing, but then when the same person emails on unrelated subjects, you think ‘Hmm, did my emails not get through?’ so you ask – only to be ignored again. Then you scratch your head until the blood drips onto the floor and the cat squalls in alarm, wondering whether what we have here is an email problem or an irritating correspondent problem. This causes bad temper and a strong desire to be in … Read the rest



Sympathetic to Husbands of ‘Difficult’ Women *

Mar 15th, 2006 | Filed by

Well, after all, she did remove her burqa.… Read the rest



Taliban ‘Roving Envoy’ Goes to Yale *

Mar 15th, 2006 | Filed by

Blames Ministry of Vice and Virtue, though he defended it in the past.… Read the rest



Education Ministers Say Silly Things *

Mar 15th, 2006 | Filed by

Worker needs not vocational knowledge but research skills, imagination, rigour in thought and argument.… Read the rest



Eloquence

Mar 14th, 2006 6:33 pm | By

Thought for the Day. Via Deborah Lipstadt’s blog History on Trial, from a correspondent

Although I am not anti-semitic, your Jewish greed is overbearing and crippling.Read the rest



Cartoons

Mar 14th, 2006 | By

The cartoons of the prophet Mohammed were published in the Jyllands-Posten on September 30. On October 17th the Egyptian newspaper al-Fagr reprinted some of the cartoons (calling them a ‘continuing insult’). On October 20th ambassadors from ten majority-Muslim countries complained to the Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who said, ‘The government refuses to apologize because the government does not control the media or a newspaper outlet; that would be in violation of the freedom of speech.’

Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Aboul Gheit wrote to the Danish PM and the UN. In December the United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, sent a letter to the Organisation of Islamic Conferences, which had complained about the cartoons. … Read the rest



The Court Laughed in Their Faces *

Mar 14th, 2006 | Filed by

Two blunt sentences in Kitzmiller decision punctured an illusion crafted by proponents of ID.… Read the rest



Rousseau and Hume *

Mar 14th, 2006 | Filed by

A book that strives more to amuse than to illuminate.… Read the rest



Wieseltier Rebukes Fish *

Mar 14th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Not all strongly held faiths are held for reasons worthy of respect.’… Read the rest



Dawkins on Selfish Gene’s 30th Anniversary *

Mar 14th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Many critics, especially vociferous ones learned in philosophy, prefer to read a book by title only.’… Read the rest



South Park’s ‘Inappropriate Ridicule’ of Religion *

Mar 14th, 2006 | Filed by

Of Scientology, that is. ‘He got a sudden case of religious sensitivity when it was his religion.’… Read the rest



No in Between?

Mar 13th, 2006 10:58 pm | By

More on free speech and the discussion with Norm, who has said more on the subject.

If the law does not prohibit people from doing something, then legally – and assuming no restraints created by voluntary contracts etc – they have the right to do that thing. It is what is sometimes called a ‘liberty right’, as opposed to a ‘claim right’…If (where) Holocaust denial is not a criminal offence, consequently, Irving and others have a liberty right to say, to write and to publish that the Holocaust did not happen or that it has been exaggerated.

Sure. I’ve stipulated that more than once – though without knowing the term ‘liberty right’, which is useful. But on the other … Read the rest



Breaking What Spell? *

Mar 13th, 2006 | Filed by

“The spell which creates an invisible moat around religion…that whispers, ‘Science Stay Away’.”… Read the rest