Charlie Brown and Lucy Go Another Round

The HERO interview is kind of a risible train wreck. It starts off by referring to ‘The [B&W] site’s editors Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom’ which of course is nonsense: there’s only one editor, and I’m it. JS has nothing to do with the content. (That’s not HERO’s fault: it no doubt got that from the Why Truth Matters jacket, which calls both of us editors of B&W. I wanted to correct that, but I was overruled.) So it starts off with an inaccuracy, and then proceeds to serve up a series of clashing replies, where I say something and JS says the opposite. (Maybe that’s a good thing – maybe it’s interesting and piquant. Maybe readers will think ‘how did these people ever manage to collaborate on a book, and what can it possibly be like?’) It ends with a grand flourish as JS cheerily disavows everything the book is about. Makes for quite a surrealistic read.

But, as I say, who knows, maybe that’s brilliant; maybe something so ludicrous and shambolic (and slightly sadistic) will make people eager to read the book. Maybe it’s postmodernism, its hour come round at last.

Comments

6 responses to “Charlie Brown and Lucy Go Another Round”

  1. Ian Gibson Avatar

    It’s okay – just put a flashing banner at the top of the main page that says:

    “Jeremy Stangroom is in no way associated with this website and anyone who claims otherwise is a big fat liar!”

    Problem solved!

  2. Josh Larios Avatar

    For what it’s worth, I took a snapshot of pretty much the entire site this afternoon. If anything … messy and unpleasant were to happen to the site, you could rebuild it from that snapshot.

  3. Andy A Avatar

    Someone probably mixed up Stangroom’s editorship of the online version of The Philosophers’ Magazine (offline editor: Julian Baggini).

  4. OB Avatar

    Oh but flashing banners are so tacky.

    Thanks, Josh!