Islamists ‘Infiltrate’ the Labour Party *

Mar 1st, 2010 | Filed by

Muslims in London say IFE are enforcing hardline views, curbing behaviour they deem ‘un-Islamic.’… Read the rest



Maintaining Scholarly Standards in Feminist Literature *

Mar 1st, 2010 | Filed by

If feminism is to be effective, it must subject to serious scrutiny even notions in accord with its societal perceptions. … Read the rest



DR Congo: Children Accused of Witchcraft *

Mar 1st, 2010 | Filed by

‘She tried to kill me with a knife. It really hurt and I cannot understand why my mother did it.’… Read the rest



Iowa: Pregnant Woman Arrested for Falling Down *

Mar 1st, 2010 | Filed by

The slut.… Read the rest



How Ireland Lost its Faith *

Feb 28th, 2010 | Filed by

All those dressed-up men in an opulent palace, kissing the pope’s ring, sent the Irish over the edge.… Read the rest



Martha Nussbaum on the Politics of Disgust *

Feb 28th, 2010 | Filed by

‘You can see the role of disgust in racism, anti-Semitism, the subordination of women.’… Read the rest



‘I Should Have Read My Islamic Marriage Contract’ *

Feb 28th, 2010 | Filed by

She tried to read it, but her grandmother, mother and father persuaded her not to. It’s all about ‘trust.’… Read the rest



Catholics and Mormons Unite Against Secularism *

Feb 28th, 2010 | Filed by

And a Stanley Fish shall lead them.… Read the rest



Pisces

Feb 27th, 2010 6:30 pm | By

I was rushing the other day so my look at Stanley Fish was general; I’m still rushing today but I want to look at a couple of details. Fish starts off:

In the always-ongoing debate about the role of religion in public life, the argument most often made on the liberal side (by which I mean the side of Classical Liberalism, not the side of left politics) is that policy decisions should be made on the basis of secular reasons, reasons that, because they do not reflect the commitments or agendas of any religion, morality or ideology, can be accepted as reasons by all citizens no matter what their individual beliefs and affiliations.

That’s one of the tricksy items … Read the rest



Fundamentalists Pitch Fit at Atheists in White House *

Feb 27th, 2010 | Filed by

‘The fact that this meeting is happening at all is an affront to the vast majority of people of all faiths.’… Read the rest



Fox News Accuses Obama of Favoring Atheists *

Feb 27th, 2010 | Filed by

Sean Hannity claims religious leaders have not been invited to the White House. Oh please.… Read the rest



Mooney Congratulates Himself *

Feb 27th, 2010 | Filed by

On his Templeton ‘Fellowship.’… Read the rest



Jerry Coyne on the Templeton Bribe *

Feb 27th, 2010 | Filed by

Templeton pays journalists to examine ‘the region where science and theology overlap’ and the journalists oblige.… Read the rest



Disturbances in the field

Feb 26th, 2010 12:28 pm | By

Well naturally – Chris Mooney has attained the apotheosis of a Templeton Fellowship – one of the ‘Templeton–Cambridge Journalism Fellowships in Science & Religion.’ Well of course he has. It’s not as if they were going to overlook him, is it!

In the fellowship program, a diverse group of eminent journalists examine key areas in the broad field of science and religion through independent research as well as seminars and discussion groups, led by some of the world’s foremost physicists, cosmologists, philosophers, biologists, and theologians, at the University of Cambridge.

The broad field of science and religion – there is no such ‘field.’ They mean subject, but if they call it a field, that gives unwary people the impression that … Read the rest



Chris Mooney is Named a Templeton Fellow [pdf] *

Feb 26th, 2010 | Filed by

What a surprise!… Read the rest



A Festering Problem in Internet Culture *

Feb 26th, 2010 | Filed by

Anonymous flaming. Richard Dawkins has had enough of it, and he’s not the only one.… Read the rest



Simon Singh and the Silencing of the Scientists *

Feb 26th, 2010 | Filed by

‘It is what is not published or has to be omitted ­because of a lawyer’s letter,’ notes Evan Harris.… Read the rest



Russell Blackford on Stanley Fish *

Feb 26th, 2010 | Filed by

Fish thinks the classical liberal tradition of Locke, Mill, and Rawls leads to an impoverishment of politics.… Read the rest



Allen Esterson on Alana Cash on Mileva Marić *

Feb 26th, 2010 | Filed by

Evidence lacking, evidence pointing the other way, evidence twisted then twisted again.… Read the rest



The fella says here

Feb 25th, 2010 12:12 pm | By

Stanley Fish is being tricksy, as he generally is, but it’s a pretty crude form of tricksiness for a supposedly sophisticated literary ‘theorist,’ especially one who is reputed to have seen through Everything at least forty years ago.

He’s comparing secularism with its opposite by setting out what he takes to be their respective views.

Let those who remain captives of ancient superstitions and fairy tales have their churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques, rituals and liturgical mumbo-jumbo; just don’t confuse the (pseudo)knowledge they traffic in with the knowledge needed to solve the world’s problems.

This picture is routinely challenged by those who contend that secular reasons and secular discourse in general don’t tell the whole story; they leave out too

Read the rest