They should APOLOGIZE

The latest TrumpOnTwitter:

No. John Lewis doesn’t need the ignoramus Trump telling him what to work on, and he’s not Trump’s assistant.

Says the man whose campaign rallies were notorious for their hatemongering which often developed into violence. Says the man who spews hatred for individuals and groups every day on Twitter. Says the meanest angriest most narcissistic man ever to be elected president of the US.

Ah, people who make mistakes should apologize. When has Trump ever apologized for a mistake? He never apologized for his torrent of lies about Obama. He never apologized for bragging about grabbing women by the pussy without their permission.

He is at this moment struggling to conclude a thought that was too long for one tweet. It’s been eleven minutes now and he still hasn’t completed it.

Couldn’t do what?

Writing is hard.

Comments

11 responses to “They should APOLOGIZE”

  1. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    49 minutes and counting. Has somebody killed his wi-fi?

  2. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    That’s 7 hours and 49 when one remembers time zones!

  3. ctygesen Avatar

    Fox News? Doesn’t he mean “Fake News”?

  4. James Garnett Avatar
    James Garnett

    “couldn’t do…” Maybe he used up his vocabulary allotment for this month.

  5. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    Nope. He has all the best words. He’s like, a smart person.

  6. Blood Knight in Sour Armor Avatar
    Blood Knight in Sour Armor

    Maybe Twitter finally banned him?

  7. Rrr Avatar

    Not that he seems to have been oversmart at any time of life, but what we may look forward to this weekend after Martin Luther King Jr Day could be the first Demential Inauguration, where this person gets to swear at a Mormon choir. NOT GOOD.

  8. Holms Avatar

    He must have seen a squirrel.

  9. Stewart Avatar

    Woodward’s labelling the Steele dossier “garbage” seems mainly to have been carried by less serious outlets. Also, this time he and Bernstein seem to disagree. Welcome sources I may have missed.

  10. Jeff Engel Avatar

    Ya know, if a document is prepped as a serious piece of potential blackmail material by a foreign government for use against the President – it’s well worth bringing to public attention in detail even if the alleged facts it relates are not yet verified. Granted, it’s imperative to make that clear and keep it front-and-center, but if it’s not falsified or rendered clearly implausible, it’s still something that, left in private, is a danger to the integrity of the administration.

    If it’s not true – if there’s even good reason to be given for supposing it’s not – then the appropriate response is to offer that reason or falsification. Telling people to shut up about the thing that’s Putin’s leverage on you so long as people DO shut up about it just makes you look guiltier.