Willoughby is furious.
Look at the fake man calling the lesbian gay bisexual alliance “fake.”
Such a liar. It’s not about “barring trans people from loos.” Single-sex spaces bar men from women’s loos [and women from men’s].
Which is why “LGBT” is such a manipulative label. Why would lesbians want men in women’s toilets? The interests of the T are not the same as the interests of the L.
Notice what he doesn’t mention. A day for women. He doesn’t like to mention women. I wonder why that might be. (Kidding. We all know why.)
What “inequality” does he think he’s talking about? It’s not “inequality” for him to be kept out of women’s toilets and scholarships and prizes.
Oh no it’s only a few years old! While this ludicrous gender ideology is older than the Acropolis, right?
He has one bit of good news.
Awesome. Stand down and be quiet.
Comments
6 responses to “Authenticity”
LGBT charities are not divided on this, because if they disagree with me I get to declare they’re not an LGBT charity.
Authenticity is such a strange concept to so many people. The minute I hear people talking about authenticity (unless they are something like art dealers or their like), I immediate suspect they are talking about artificial authenticity. Fake authenticity.
My turn to be the pedant in the room. He’s a real man, but a fake woman. He’s also no true scotmaning the hell out of the LGB community. What an ass.
Why doesn’t Labour care? ‘cuz Starmer’s looking at a future majority and looked at what Sturgeon did in Scotland…
Somebody might mention to Mister Willoughby that the reason trans will be “cut up” like meat if a fair debate is allowed is because the trans cult ideology is make-believe.
Papito: Well, LGBT groups would be those that are all four; i.e., L and G and B and T. Any group that only serves a strict subset wouldn’t be an LGBT group. Of course, interpreting LGBT this way means that the phrase “LGBT people” would be those that are all four; i.e., L and G and B and T. This is obviously nonsensical, as no one can be all four of those things simultaneously. Well, not without redefining what those things are, at least.