Stay home then
“If it bothers you so much to possibly be in the bathroom with a trans person, who’s in a stall, with a closed door” – big smirk on the “in a stall, with a closed door” bit.
But here’s the thing. People can open the door, and come out of the stall. The fact that the man in the women’s toilet is in a stall with a closed door when a woman enters the room is not all that consoling or reassuring given the fact that the door is locked on his side, not her side. It’s all very well for smirky condescending bro in the pink bathing suit to pretend that a toilet stall is as impregnable as a bank vault, but the reality is we all know damn well it’s no such thing.
Thanks bro… Or you could use the men’s toilets, in a cubicle with a closed door. If that level of safety is enough for women, it’s safety enough for you too. But this way, the fewest people possible are inconvenienced, and to a much lesser degree – being asked to use the men’s instead of the women’s is much less of an imposition than being asked to not use any at all.
But of course narcissism blinds the man with breast implants to any convenience but his own; he’d prefer to bring women back into the ‘toilet leash’ days.
Yet another example of somehow not realizing that the argument cuts both ways. If women’s discomfort is sufficient reason for them to stop using public restrooms, then it is reasonable to say that his professed discomfort with being in the men’s room must also be sufficient reason for him to stop using public restrooms.
It’s almost impressive how sophomoric their rhetoric is. (It is impressive how misogynistic, homophobic, doublethinkish, and narcissistic it is.)
Can’t they just piss outside? Since they have dicks?
So, is he suggesting a return to the urinary leash?