The BBC always gave the trans person the last word. Not by accident, but very deliberately indeed. The BBC literally refused to let gender atheists speak last. It was systematic.

I’m so naive, or clueless, that I still after all this time find that surprising. Where were all the grownups?

The BBC has been captured by activists who peddle trans “propaganda”, the woman who blew the whistle on the Tavistock clinic has claimed.

Sue Evans helped expose the medical centre’s use of puberty blockers on child patients, which eventually led to its being shut down.

…

She alleges that a flagship Radio 2 show refused to let her have the final say during debates on gender and that she was told she would only be able to give her opinions before representatives from pro-trans groups gave theirs, denying her the chance to rebut statements that were “clinically inaccurate”.

They have to say “she alleges” for legal reasons, but they document that it’s not a mere allegation.

Texts seen by The Telegraph show a BBC producer repeatedly apologising for their boss’s refusal to allow her to speak last on air, saying that staff were “very embarrassed” at the situation.

The fantasists and liars get the last word, enforced by the BBC. Why? Where were the adults?

Ms Evans began working as a clinical nurse at the Tavistock clinic in 2003 as part of the gender identity development service (GIDS).

However, she became concerned after she learnt a colleague was willing to put a 16-year-old on puberty blockers after meeting him just four times. Ms Evans reported her concerns to her team but decided to blow the whistle after feeling her “deep” worries were not being addressed.

…

In December 2020, she won a judicial review, where a judge initially ruled that children under 16 could not give informed consent to have puberty blockers.

“That should have been massive on BBC News, but it wasn’t,” Ms Evans said. “It would always be concluded by someone from the trans community saying, ‘This is terrible news for trans people. This is a genocide in medicine’.”

We’re very familiar with the pattern.

Ms Evans was invited onto a BBC radio show to discuss the case. Ms Evans agreed to participate on the condition that she be allowed to speak after any pro-trans group to give her a “chance to comment” on claims made by organisations such as Mermaids, a charity that advocates for transgender children.

“On this particular occasion, I said I would come on if I was allowed to respond to Mermaids,” she said. A BBC staffer initially agreed to this before they were overruled by a senior producer who decided Mermaids would speak last.

And there you have it. The pro-mutilating children side always got the last word. Always. It wasn’t casual, it wasn’t accidental, it was unbending policy.

After learning of the order change of guests, the junior producer texted Ms Evans: “They won’t give you ability to respond to Mermaids. It will be awful – I am so sorry.”

Apologising again some weeks later, the producer added: “I think many of us are very embarrassed at the current state of things. I am so sorry about it all.”

Speaking now about her experience, Ms Evans said: “They would always let Mermaids or Tavistock have the final say, it was a constant washout. It always made me look like I had been lying. I felt like I was on to be the fall guy, so they could say, ‘She’s a bigot’. Where’s the balance? There’s a very serious malpractice going on in medicine. It’s very, very frustrating to feel you get edged out of the picture and be cast as out of touch.”

All for the sake of ruining the bodies and lives of children who’ve been suckered by this hideous ideology.