Even the Spectator does it.

So the Spectator bows down to censorship AND obscures information that is central to the story. Saying “transgender doctor” is MEANINGLESS. The core fact in this whole conflict, which has been keeping a tribunal busy for days, is that a male doctor bullied a female nurse who objected to his presence in the women’s changing room. The fact that the Spectator alters Joanna Cherry’s writing such that it draws a veil over that fact is an outrage.

It’s doubly insulting and infuriating, doing this. There’s the obvious infuriating insult of changing her wording to hide the crucial fact, but there’s the slightly less obvious infuriating insult of making her say something stupid that she did not in fact say.