He had benefited
“Sarah” Savage, the guy who pulled the fire alarm because women were holding a meeting, gets attention from the less fastidious news media for being a trans woman who demands all the rights.
The transgender community fears its rights are “melting away” after a legal ruling which has left people “terrified”, according to one trans woman.
Sarah Savage, a trans woman who is the chief executive and co-founder of Trans Pride Brighton, said it was not long ago that trans rights felt “solidified”.
Miss Savage described the ruling as “extremely worrying”, adding she had benefited from access to a women’s refuge after she came out and is now concerned that opportunity has been taken away from others.
Extremely worrying for whom?
He benefited from access to a women’s refuge but the women in that refuge had their benefit taken away. It’s so interesting the way hack journalists forget to point that out, and their editors fail to catch the omission. It’s so interesting the way journalism as such simply ignores this whole issue.
Miss Savage added: “It makes me feel scared for the future because my rights are literally being taken away before my very eyes. What if I need to go to a hospital? Am I going to be treated with respect? What kind of ward am I going to be put in?”
If he is put in a women’s ward, what kind of ward are the women then in? Why is one man’s unreasonable demand treated as a human rights issue while the human rights of the women involved are treated as biggottree?
“Trans people just want to have a quiet life, we just want to get on with it. We don’t want all this drama, we just want respect.”
They just want to get on with taking women’s rights away. As for the drama – you have got to be kidding. They love the drama – it’s all about them.
A director of community group TransActual, jane fae – who spells her name in lower case – also expressed concern about her potential future care.
“As I get older I may need hospital care, I foresee being forced into the indignity of being on a male ward, that would be upsetting to say the least,” the 67-year-old from Letchworth told PA.
Same again. Does he worry that the women who had to put up with him in their ward would find it upsetting? Of course not. His wants are everything, theirs are just something he gets to drive a tank through.
spells the name with lower case letters. How pwogweziv!! How revolutionary! Why does the main stream liberal press e any credence these fools?
Well they wouldn’t have melted away so easily if they had been actual rights, and not based on an unlawful interpretation of the statutes they were carried in on, would they?
Only to the degree by which your campaign of lying, bullying, and terrorism had succeeded. These “rights” were only “solid” because they were enforced on a largely apathetic, deceived, and cowed public, through the expedient of “NO DEBATE.” Actual opponents to this program were villified and threatened. Yeah, some really solid “rights” there, mate.
HAHAHAHA! Thats a good one! No, really, let’s dig into this. Let’s look at just one of your own actions and see how well they conform to this claim. I’m talking of course about your library alarm stunt. Fire alarms are not “quiet.” Misusing them is usually a criminal offence. How did your pulling that fire alarm to disrupt a meeting on women’s health help you “just get on with it”? How was that not drama? How did that contribute to your desire for “respect”? It shows you to be a self-centred, bullying, contemptable coward of a man. Acts like this go against all of your claims, and in fact hurt the efforts of those apochryphal trans folk who really do want a quiet life. You are not a very constructive poster boy for your cause, but you sure seem to be a representative one.
Those aren’t your “rights” you’re seeing taken away, it’s the restoration of stolen property to its rightful owners. Your access and intrusion was illegal from the start. You barged into spaces and opportunities never meant for you, to which you were not entitled or qualified. Nobody has the right to do that, though thugs and gangsters would disagree. That’s what you’ve been; a thug and a gangster. You deserve no sympathy. You knew what you were doing when you violated women’s boundaries. Shut up, get the fuck out, and stay out.
Respect is a two-way street, and it is earned. You haven’t offered any to the women whose rights and safety you have strived so mightily to diminish, so no respect for you.
One for men, which is what you are, always have been, and always will be. Nothing you say, or wear, or do can ever change that. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s just the way things are. It’s where you belong. Not with women. You’ve already shown you are threat to them. Nobody has to play along with your delusional self-image. If you still insist on being put into a female only ward, then the facility you should be housed in should be one specializing in mental illness, and a secured one at that.
And it’s so interesting that these same journalists take great pains to let us know that the lower case affectation* of the man they’re quoting is not a spelling mistake on their part. Priorities people, priorities.
And why is that an indignityfor you? You are a man. (See above re: “Sarah” Savage’s hospital ward anxiety.) You don’t need to be on a female ward any more than you need a pap smear or hysterectomy. You might need specialized treatment to take into account any “gender affirming care” you might have subjected yourself to in the past, but none of that turned you into a woman, however extensive and convincingly lifelike they might have turned out. You’re not any kind of woman; stop pretending you are. That continued insistence, and your forcing your delusional beliefs on everyone else (especially women)? There’s your indignity right there.
*Another example of playing helpless and self-effacing? “Oooh look at me with my lower case, I’m so small and unintimidating. Let me into your spaces! I won’t hurt you, I promise! Don’t put me in with the other, beaslty, UPPER CASE men!”
I’m assuming that his little stunt was a protest against women meeting without including the trans, and that the lack of inclusion makes those women a hate group in his eyes. In the same way, those who are breaking away from the letter soup and forming groups centred on just L, G, and B are vilified as hate groups because they ignore the T. And yet I’d bet that he sees no problem with Trans Pride Brighton being at the very least nominally exclusive of all but the trans because…reasons.
[…] a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on He had […]