His human rights

But do not call him Ted.

Dr Beth Upton’s birth name will be redacted in official Sandie Peggie documents, the tribunal judge has ruled. The case has restarted for a third time with final submissions being put forward by each legal team before a decision will be made towards the end of the year.

Born Theodore Upton, the name was used on the General Medical Council register before he was re-registered under his new name, Dr Beth Upton. His legal team claimed that publishing his birth name would be against his human rights and would out him as a trans woman.

Judge Sandy Kemp ruled in his favour, confirming that the submissions can be published but Theodore Upton will be redacted from all of the documents. His full name will now not be included when Ms Peggie’s evidence is made public, as well as submissions from those on her side.

Fabulous; that way no one will ever know or suspect or guess that he’s not a woman.

Ms Peggie’s lawyer Naomi Cunningham asked for the documents to be published in full to promote “open justice” and “freedom of self expression.” But Ms Russell argued that using the Theodore Upton name was “gratuitous and unnecessary” and claimed that it triggered “gender dysphoria.”

Of course it’s not gratuitous and unnecessary, it’s the whole point. The man is not a god damn woman and he has no right to persecute women who don’t want him in their changing rooms. That’s it, that’s the case!

She pointed out that he is not being sued under that name and cited legislation such as the gender recognition law and the Equal Treatment Bench Book to prove her point. She quoted this: “Name or pronouns can be very important to the transperson. It can be a sign of disrespect if transperson is not referred to by them.

Nobody cares.

“No one should be outed, everyone should be treated with courtesy and dignity.” She went on to claim that the “gratuitous dropping of the deadname in the submissions is harmful” to Dr Upton, and using the deadname is “not relevant in this case.”

It’s not gratuitous. Again: the fact that he’s not a woman is central to the hearing. All this cringing and bowing and scraping is how we got here. It is not reasonable or fair for men to order everyone to call them “her”.

But he got his way all the same.

6 Responses to “His human rights”

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting