Virtues n skills
The very right-wing but not absolutely always wrong about everything American Enterprise Institute on that ridiculous chart about white culture in July 2020:
In the wake of the police killing of George Floyd and subsequent protests over police brutality, interest in “anti-racist” education has exploded among educators and advocates. The case that educators should seek to combat racism seems self-evident. What’s less clear is how the admirable cause of “anti-racism” is fueling, in some corners, the inclination to denounce universal virtues and useful skills as the product of “white culture.”
Witness last week’s contretemps at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture. The museum, which bills itself as “the only national museum devoted exclusively” to educating the public on these topics, recently debuted the online guide “Talking about Race.” The guide included a chart cataloguing the “aspects and assumptions” of “white culture” that “have been normalized over time and are now considered standard practices in the United States.”
What are these sinister aspects of “white culture,” you ask? Well, according to the Smithsonian, values like “hard work,” “self-reliance,” “be[ing] polite,” and timeliness are all a product of the “white dominant culture.” Indeed, it turns out that conventional grammar, Christianity, the notion that “intent counts” in courts of law, and the scientific method and its emphasis on “objective, rational linear thinking” are all proprietary to “white culture.”
The self-destructiveness just leaps off the page, doesn’t it. Really, Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture? You really want to make all those things the provenance of wypipo? Are you sure?
There are several things that might be said about all this. But the place to start may be by observing just how insidious it is to teach black children to reject intellectual and personal traits that promote personal and civic success — in the U.S. or anywhere else. After all, in what land are students well-served when they’re encouraged not to work hard, make decisions, think rationally, or be polite and on time?
And not even just success. You want those traits because they are good in themselves – intrinsically good as opposed to instrumentally. Being polite is better than being rude for the kinds of reasons that explain why being decent is better than being a shit.
After an online outcry, the Smithsonian removed the chart on Thursday night — but not with any denunciation of the chart’s content, only the bland understatement that the chart turned out to “not contribute to the productive discussion” they had wished for. Of course, the lack of “productive discussion” shouldn’t have surprised, given the shoddy scholarship it reflected. The original chart contained a single footnote linking to a one-page PDF asserting, sans evidence, that traits such as “hard work,” “self-reliance,” and politeness “are common characteristics of most U.S. White people most of the time.”
Somebody was taking a stab at comparing capitalist virtues to some other kind, which is far from a novel line of thought. One can generally see the outlines of a point – capitalist virtues help you get ahead yadda yadda but there’s more to life than getting ahead blah blah. True enough, but be careful what you argue for.

When I first started at my teaching job in Nebraska (literally just started – it was my first day) I was required to go to an inservice (we all were) about ‘teaching Hispanic students’, who apparently don’t bother to do homework, keep deadlines, get to class on time, or ever, ever, ever question anything said by anyone in authority. Instead of telling us how to work around these, we were told to quit thinking like the imperialists we were and realize that deadlines and schedules are things of the past, and the new, more inclusive culture, was going to do away with those.
This was back WHEN I FIRST STARTED the job I JUST RETIRED FROM. It’s been going on too long.
Personally, I thought it was an insult both to those of us who value the traits they were dismissing, and to the students assumed unable to live up to them. In fact, I never saw any such thing in my Hispanic students (and I had quite a number of them over the years). They were as hard working as anyone else, they usually were at class on time, though of course there were, I imagine, cases of tardies so infrequent they don’t stand out, and they completed their homework at approximately the same percentage as other students. They were more polite, so being polite may not actually be a “white” virtue. It might be that people just find life is nice when you are polite most of the time.
As I noted when we first saw that chart back in the day, the traits are actually fine in a context-neutral fashion. However, many of them are often used in weaponized ways against racial minorities–and, for that matter, against women. How many scolds have we seen on the trans side berating feminists for being rude and impolite while trying to shut down that nonsense? “Self-reliance” is basically a way of saying, “No, there’s no need for affirmative action policies”. “Hard work” is another meritocracy myth, for that matter. And of course, accusing people of being ‘irrational’ because they are pissed off about an injustice is an old-hat trick for misogynists and racists alike.
That said, I agree that without that context, the list is absurd. What I don’t know is if the exhibit actually went into that context, or if they just posted the list that then got spread around the internet.
Can we use these on Trump? Where’s Trump’s politeness? Where’s his self-reliance? When has he ever done the hard work of trying to understand the job he’s supposed to be doing? In what sense is he rational?
Don’t mind me, just daydreaming. I don’t disagree with what you say.