Invitation only

Regime Movie Night.

On Thursday afternoon, in the lobby of the Trump Kennedy Center, reporters whispered in hushed voices to each other to see which journalists, if any, would be allowed entry to a screening of Melania Trump’s documentary “Melania.”

In the hours before the film screened (press check-in began at 2 p.m. for the 6 p.m. carpet), there was slight optimism from veteran reporters, accustomed to slipping their way into Trump World, that they’d be able to network their way into a seat. But by 6:30 p.m., when members of the administration began walking the carpet, it became clear that most of the mainstream press would be blocked from attending the Amazon MGM Studios film.

Well duh. If you’re mainstream press you’re probably not going to heap flattery on a movie about a woman sleazy enough to marry Donald Trump.

Reporters from The New York Times, The Washington Post, AP and Vanity Fair, among dozens of other outlets on the carpet, were not granted tickets to the invit[ation]-only screening in the Opera House, located one floor above the carpet. The only press from the carpet allowed into the screening (not counting those separately invited) were One America News anchor Dan Ball and his wife Peyton Drew, a producer for the far-right news channel.

Regime media only. Bow to the pretty lady.

The film opens on Friday, Jan. 30 against a backdrop of political unrest, with ICE raids in Minneapolis and other parts of the country causing increased backlash against the administration’s glitzy White House screening earlier this week (with Apple CEO Tim Cook in attendance) and tonight’s premiere.

When asked about the exorbitant amount of money Amazon spent on the film — Amazon MGM paid $40 million for rights to the doc, and reportedly another $35 million on marketing — Trump said he “wasn’t involved with that.”

And it was in no way a barely disguised bribe. Good heavens no.

Comments

4 responses to “Invitation only”

  1. Harald Hanche-Olsen Avatar

    And it was in no way a barely disguised bribe. Good heavens no.

    Agreed: There was no attempt to disguise it that I can detect. But perhaps my disguise detector is defective.

  2. Piglet Avatar
    Piglet

    Blocking “hostile” press from attending the screening isn’t going to make them any less hostile. Those screenshots of near-empty movie theatre seating charts that have been doing the rounds? Mostly critics hoping that their corrosively bitchy review of Melania will be the one that goes viral.

    What I still can’t work out is why though. Obviously I understand the point of billionaires giving the Trump crime family an enormous bribe, but I honestly can’t work out why they gave this ridiculous piece of crap a cinematic release. Who did they think the audience would be? It’s rated PG so we know she keeps her clothes on, and it’s not like Melania Trump ever showed the least interest in doing First Lady stuff around the White House (“who gives a Fock about Creasemus?”) It’s easier to conceal or game or simply fake ratings on Amazon Prime, than to hide empty cinemas.

  3. Freemage Avatar
    Freemage

    Piglet @2:

    It’s a result of the curious doublethink that those in Trump’s orbit must engage in, in order to stay within the inner circle. Yes, it’s a naked scam to cover a massive bribe, but it must also be a legitimate attempt to make a flattering and grandiose film about the Trumps. Trump is surrounded by people who insist that he is popular and loved and so forth, and thus he sees no reason why this vanity piece shouldn’t be released upon the masses for them to enjoy. Keeping press out of the premier is simply playing to his victimization narrative, where all legitimate press outlets are obviously conspiring against him, so they couldn’t possibly give it a fair review, anyway.

    It’d be funny if it weren’t so grotesque.

  4. Francis Boyle Avatar
    Francis Boyle

    I have a confession to make. I was wrong. A while back I said sitting in a concert hall listening to a work was my idea of hell. What a fool I was!

    Seriously, why would journalists want to subject themselves to this. That it exists is a legitimate news story. But like typhoid or gangrene there is no need to subject yourself to it in order to report on it.

    On the other hand, sometimes she can be quite entertaining: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQ25e66cZF8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *