Woowoo
Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader, has “presented” Donald Trump with her Nobel Peace Prize as she attempted to woo the US president.
Sigh. Look. That’s not how this works. The object is not the point. It takes someone pathetically literal-minded and obtuse to think it is. In fact, if you think about it for five seconds, it becomes obvious that being in possession of someone else’s prize is more a disgrace than an honor. It’s like being a toddler whining about not getting any presents at another toddler’s birthday party.
Mr Trump has made no secret of his desire to be awarded the honour, which has been bestowed on several former presidents including Barack Obama.
Yes, he’s made no secret of his infantile greed, in other words he’s made a public fool of himself many times by whining about it.
Ms Machado, whose liberal Vente Venezuela party is widely believed to have won the 2024 election, was given the award for “promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela”.
Which is not a reason anyone is ever going to cite for giving an award to Donald Trump.
Days earlier the Nobel Institute had ruled against Ms Machado’s previous suggestion of transferring last year’s peace prize to Mr Trump. Earlier in the day the Nobel organisers posted on X: “A medal can change owners, but the title of a Nobel Peace Prize laureate cannot.”
Last week, Mr Trump said he could not think of “anybody in history that should get the Nobel Peace Prize more than me”.
Well no shit, he can’t think of anybody in history period.
He can’t think, period.
Trump has been doing this for years. Didn’t he convince a veteran to give him his Purple Heart in … 2016 or 2017 or so?
Sounds familiar.”Gimme your p*ssy.”
I keep thinking of Georgy de Hevesy dissolving Nobel medals in aqua regia so that they wouldn’t fall into the hands of the Nazis. It’s a great story that everybody loves. But what Trump doesn’t seem to realise is that even if the Nazis had found and taken the medals, it wouldn’t have changed the fact that Laue and Franck were the Nobel laureates. They were the ones who had done the work and been awarded the prizes, and stealing their physical medals would not have changed that.
https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/10/03/140815154/dissolve-my-nobel-prize-fast-a-true-story
Which makes as much sense as giving Bill Maher the Richard Dawkins Award for promoting “science” and “reason”. You can’t be pro anyone’s “democratic rights” and pro Trump at the same time. It’s not enough to be against one particular evil if your goal is to put something equally bad in its place. Mind you, they might as well give the damn price to Trump at this point, since the whole thing has become so tainted that no halfway decent person could possibly want it anyway.