Men men men, as far as the eye can see

Oh lord.

Seemingly led by men on Twitter? Maybe just Twitter that’s depressing?

There is no “Twitter” in that sense – no universal or general Twitter. There’s only the Twitter each person sees because of which people she follows. Ok you can see a less curated Twitter via trends and the like, but it’s still not some generalized “Twitter.” It’s a selection.

And, no. It’s not the case that the debate is led by men.

Many women told him as much.

So what did he do? Ignored every single one of them, and replied only to men.

And they wonder why we pay attention to this gender stuff.

https://twitter.com/bailey6117/status/1153414830113665025

He ignored them and all the others. No wonder he thinks the discussion is led by men.

Comments

4 responses to “Men men men, as far as the eye can see”

  1. maddog1129 Avatar

    Well, part of the debate — the debatable part — is championed by men, with the usual threats, taunts, and menaces.

  2. Red Tide Avatar

    Someone in that thread posited that he uses TERFblocker, since he was claiming to literally not be able to see many of the replies.

    No reason to be curious about why women on the gender critical side of the debate seem to get added to TERFblocker while the men on the same side avoid it. Nope, noting to see here.

  3. James Garnett Avatar
    James Garnett

    Someone in that thread posited that he uses TERFblocker, since he was claiming to literally not be able to see many of the replies.

    Hmm, if he was, he’s not anymore. I know because my twitter account is listed by it, but I can see his tweets, and I doubt that he’s unblocked me specifically. So it appears that he can’t use that excuse; he’s just a lazy, unobservant man.

  4. Red Tide Avatar

    @James Garnett I see. I’m pretty ignorant about how twitter works – I guess it doesn’t make sense that they could reply to his tweets if he’d blocked them.