Guest post: The women’s branch
Originally a comment by maddog on Utmost regret and sadness.
Never mind that WI can celebrate and fawn over the completely ignored part of the “transgender communinny,” the transgender people who are actually women, i.e., the “trans men.”
They wail and gnash their teeth about how tragic and unfair it is to make them exclude “trans women,” who are men, and pretend that the new landscape forces them to discriminate against the “trans communinny,” as if there weren’t an existing component of the “trans communinny” who actually belong in the Women’s Institute: the women who so deeply feel the oppression of women that they seek to escape it by pretending to be men.
The Women’s Institute can be incloosive of the trans communinny by welcoming the trans people who actually are women, but no, they ignore the women’s branch of the trans communinny as if it doesn’t exist.
Transgender ideology is a men’s rights movement.
