Unwanted conduct
NHS bosses discriminated against a group of female nurses by allowing a trans colleague into their changing room, a tribunal ruled on Friday.
In what the eight nurses’ legal team described as a “landmark judgment”, a specialist employment law judge also said the women were harassed by managers at County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, who unlawfully required them to share the female-only facilities with Rose Henderson, who was born a man but identifies as a woman.
It shouldn’t take any kind of specialist to know that.
Judge Seamus Sweeney said that trust managers had “engaged in unwanted conduct”, that the policy had the effect of “violating the dignity” of the nurses and that it created “a hostile, humiliating and degrading environment”.
And all this on behalf of a grotesque, unfair, women-hating dogma that men’s pretend-gender gets to cancel women’s rights to safety, privacy, dignity.
The judge, who was part of a three-strong panel, said the trust had behaved unlawfully “by not taking seriously and declining to address” the nurses’ concerns, which had been raised in 2023 and 2024.
And why did the trust do that?
Don’t look at me for an answer; I’ll never understand it. It’s just a silly greedy whim on the part of men who like to dress up as women, while for women it’s the most basic and necessary right to safety from men in general.
Great! Now all we need is a guideline on how to interpret the ruling.
And a a guideline on how to interpret the guideline on how to interpret the ruling.
And a a guideline on how to interpret the guideline on how to interpret the guideline on how to interpret the ruling.
Etc. etc. ad infinitum.
Just like in the Sandie Peggy case, the employment judge blames institutional failure and holds the creepy TIM blameless. Multiple women complained of Henderson’s conduct in the changing room, including flashing his genitals through holes in his briefs, yet the judge has effectively ruled that the women were mistaken, lying or making it up. I guess it’s not only sharia that requires female testimony have supporting male testimony. It’s outrageous how these TIM pervs keep getting treated with kid gloves.
You can see what a gorgeous womanly woman he is here:
https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2025-11-11/decision-in-transgender-nurse-tribunal-not-expected-before-christmas
I think that there is a much better picture at the Telegraph, but I can’t get to that.
Of course it wouldn’t make any difference if he looked like Ana de Armas. He still wouldn’t belong in female-only spaces.
There’s no “but” about it. He was not just “born” male, he is male, and he will be, or will have been, male every single day of his life.